A multiple criteria approach for building a pandemic impact assessment composite indicator: The case of COVID-19 in Portugal

被引：7

作者：

Figueira J.R. ^{[1
]}

Oliveira H.M. ^{[2
]}

Serro A.P. ^{[3
]}

Colaço R. ^{[4
]}

Froes F. ^{[5
]}

Robalo Cordeiro C. ^{[5
]}

Diniz A. ^{[5
]}

Guimarães M. ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] CEGIST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, Lisboa

[2] CAMGSD, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa

[3] CQE, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa

[4] IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa

[5] GCOM, Ordem dos Médicos

来源：

Eur J Oper Res | 2023年 / 2卷 / 795-818期

关键词：

Composite indicator; Deck of cards method; Multi-attribute value theory (MAVT); Multiple criteria analysis; Robustness and validation analyses;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ejor.2023.01.025

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major damage and disruption to social, economic, and health systems (among others). In addition, it has posed unprecedented challenges to public health and policy/decision-makers who have been responsible for designing and implementing measures to mitigate its strong negative impact. The Portuguese health authorities have used decision analysis techniques to assess the impact of the pandemic and implemented measures for counties, regions, or across the entire country. These decision tools have been subject to some criticism and many stakeholders requested novel approaches. In particular, those which considered the dynamic changes in the pandemic's behaviour due to new virus variants and vaccines. A multidisciplinary team formed by researchers from the COVID-19 Committee of Instituto Superior Técnico at the University of Lisbon (CCIST analyst team) and physicians from the Crisis Office of the Portuguese Medical Association (GCOM expert team) collaborated to create a new tool to help politicians and decision-makers to fight the pandemic. This paper presents the main steps that led to the building of a pandemic impact assessment composite indicator applied to the specific case of COVID-19 in Portugal. A multiple criteria approach based on an additive multi-attribute value theory aggregation model was used to build the pandemic assessment composite indicator. The parameters of the additive model were devised based on an interactive socio-technical and co-constructive process between the CCIST and GCOM team members. The deck of cards method was the adopted technical tool to assist in the assessment the value functions as well as in the assessment of the criteria weights. The final tool was presented at a press conference and had a powerful impact on the Portuguese media and on the main health decision-making stakeholders in the country. In this paper, a completed mathematical and graphical description of this tool is presented. © 2023 The Author(s)

引用

页码：795 / 818

页数：23

共 51 条

[1]

Azevedo L., Pereira M.J., Ribeiro M.C., Soares A., Geostatistical COVID-19 infection risk maps for Portugal, International Journal of Health Geographics, 19, 1, (2020)

[2]

Belton V., Stewart T.J., Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach, (2002)

[3]

Bottero M., Ferretti V., Figueira J.R., Greco S., Roy B., On the Choquet multiple criteria preference aggregation model: Theoretical and practical insights from a real-world application, European Journal of Operational Research, 271, 1, pp. 120-140, (2018)

[4]

Bouyssou D., Pirlot M., Conjoint measurement tools for MCDM: A brief introduction, Multiple criteria decision analysis, pp. 97-151, (2016)

[5]

Brans J.-P., De Smet Y., PROMETHEE methods, Multiple criteria decision analysis, pp. 187-219, (2016)

[6]

Catala M., Marchena M., Conesa D., Palacios P., Urdiales T., Alonso S., Prats C., Monitoring and analysis of COVID-19 pandemic: The need for an empirical approach, Frontiers in Public Health, 9, (2021)

[7]

Corrente S., Figueira J.R., Greco S., Pairwise comparison tables within the deck of cards method in multiple criteria decision aiding, European Journal of Operational Research, 291, 2, pp. 738-756, (2021)

[8]

Bana e Costa C., De Corte J.-M., Vansnick J.C., Mathematical foundations of MACBETH, Multiple criteria decision analysis, pp. 421-463, (2016)

[9]

Cox A., What's wrong with risk matrices?, Risk Analysis, 28, 2, pp. 497-512, (2008)

[10]

Dinis D., Figueira J.R., Teixeira A.P., (2021)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →