Evaluation of thin film composite forward osmosis membranes: Effect of polyamide preparation conditions

被引:0
|
作者
Kadhom A.M. [1 ]
Al-Furaiji M.H. [2 ]
Abudi Z.N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Environmental Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad
[2] Environment and Water Directorate, Ministry of Science and Technology, Baghdad
关键词
D O I
10.5194/dwes-14-45-2021
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The forward osmosis (FO) process has been considered for desalination as a competitive option with respect to the traditional reverse osmosis process. The interfacial polymerization (IP) reaction between two monomers (i.e., m-phenylenediamine, MPD, and 1,3,5-benzenetricarbonyl chloride, TMC) is typically used to prepare the selective polyamide layer that prevents salts and allows water molecules to pass. In this research, we investigated the effect of preparation conditions (MPD contact time, TMC reaction time, and addition of an amine salt) on the FO performance in terms of water flux and salt flux. The results showed that increasing MPD contact time resulted in a significant increase in the water flux and salt flux. However, increasing TMC reaction time caused a decline in both the water flux and the salt flux. The optimum condition that gave the highest water flux (64 L m-2 h-1) was found to be as 5 min for MPD and 1 min for TMC. The addition of an amine salt of camphorsulfonic acid-triethylamine (CSA-TEA) was able to have an apparent effect on the FO process by increasing the water flux (74.5 L m-2 h-1). © 2021 Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 52
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Thin Film Composite Membranes for Forward Osmosis Supported by Commercial Nanofiber Nonwovens
    Chowdhury, Maqsud R.
    Huang, Liwei
    McCutcheon, Jeffley R.
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2017, 56 (04) : 1057 - 1063
  • [32] Polydopamine modified thin film composite membranes for forward and pressure retarded osmosis
    Arena, Jason
    Reimund, Kevin
    McCutcheon, Jeffrey R.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 244
  • [33] Phenol rejection by cellulose triacetate and thin film composite forward osmosis membranes
    Xiao, Tingting
    Nghiem, Long D.
    Song, Jianfeng
    Bao, Ruyi
    Li, Xuemei
    He, Tao
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 186 : 45 - 54
  • [34] Silicene nanosheets as support fillers for thin film composite forward osmosis membranes
    Bendoy, Anelyn P.
    Zeweldi, Hana G.
    Park, Myoung Jun
    Shon, Ho Kyong
    Kim, Hern
    Chung, Wook-Jin
    Nisola, Grace M.
    DESALINATION, 2022, 536
  • [35] Scaling prevention of thin film composite polyamide Reverse Osmosis membranes by Zn ions
    Aziz, Mujahid
    Kasongo, Godwill
    DESALINATION, 2019, 464 : 76 - 83
  • [36] Zeolite-polyamide thin film nanocomposite membranes: Towards enhanced performance for forward osmosis
    Ma, Ning
    Wei, Jing
    Liao, Rihong
    Tang, Chuyang Y.
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2012, 405 : 149 - 157
  • [37] Forward osmosis application of modified TiO2-polyamide thin film nanocomposite membranes
    Amini, Maryam
    Rahimpour, Ahmad
    Jahanshahi, Mohsen
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2016, 57 (30) : 14013 - 14023
  • [38] Tailoring the Polyamide Active Layer of Thin-Film Composite Forward Osmosis Membranes with Combined Cosolvents during Interfacial Polymerization
    Li, Yu
    Pan, Guoyuan
    Wang, Jing
    Zhang, Yang
    Shi, Hongwei
    Yu, Hao
    Liu, Yiqun
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2020, 59 (17) : 8230 - 8242
  • [39] Effect of substrate structure on the performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes
    Shi, L.
    Chou, S. R.
    Wang, R.
    Fang, W. X.
    Tang, C. Y.
    Fane, A. G.
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2011, 382 (1-2) : 116 - 123
  • [40] Catalytic effect of iron on the tolerance of thin-film composite polyamide reverse osmosis membranes to hydrogen peroxide
    Ling, Ran
    Yu, Ling
    Thi Phuong Thuy Pham
    Shao, Jiahui
    Chen, J. Paul
    Reinhard, Martin
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2018, 548 : 91 - 98