Development of an analytical model for cost-based optimization of KVIC biogas plant dimensions

被引：0
作者：
Bandgar P.S. [1 ]
Jain S. [1 ]
Panwar N.L. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, College of Technology and Engineering, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, 313001, RJ
来源：
Bioresource Technology Reports | 2021年 / 16卷
关键词：
Analytical model; Cost of construction; Hydraulic retention time; KVIC biogas plant; Optimization of cost;
D O I：
10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100879
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This study has been carried out in response to minimizing the capital cost of construction at optimum efficiency from the Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC) biogas plant. The main aim was to find out the optimized dimensions of KVIC in the different climatic zones of India with varying hydraulic retention times (HRT). For this study, a 2 m3 capacity biogas plant was selected and the analytical model has been developed to generate optimized dimensions; the result were used to generate the equations to obtain the directly optimized dimensions for KVIC biogas plant. As per the cost of floating drum and cost of construction of digester, the various dimensions have been calculated from the developed equations and concluded that lowering the cost of the floating drum alone translates to typical plants narrow and deep digesters. However, developed model shall be useful for quick prediction of dimensions of KVIC biogas plant. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Bandgar P.S., Jain S., Panwar N., Current status, opportunities and challenges in anaerobic digestion in Indian context: an overview, Bioresour. Technol. Rep., (2021)
  • [2] Bayr S., Rantanen M., Kaparaju P., Rintala J., Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of rendering plant and slaughterhouse wastes, Bioresour. Technol., 104, pp. 28-36, (2012)
  • [3] De la Rubia M.A., Fernandez-Cegri V., Raposo F., Borja R., Influence of particle size and chemical composition on the performance and kinetics of anaerobic digestion process of sunflower oil cake in batch mode, Biochem. Eng. J., 58-59, pp. 162-167, (2011)
  • [4] Gu Y., Chen X., Liu Z., Zhou X., Zhang Y., Effect of inoculum sources on the anaerobic digestion of rice straw, Bioresour. Technol., 158, pp. 149-155, (2014)
  • [5] Kalyanasundaram G.T., Ramasamy A., Godwin B., Desikan R., Subburamu K., Prospects and challenges in biogas technology: Indian scenario, Biogas Prod., pp. 19-37, (2020)
  • [6] Karimov K.S., Abid M., Biogas digester with simple solar heater, IIUM Eng. J., 13, (2012)
  • [7] Labatut R.A., Angenent L.T., Scott N.R., Conventional mesophilic vs. thermophilic anaerobic digestion: atrade-off between performance and stability?, Water Res., 53, pp. 249-258, (2014)
  • [8] Li D., Song L., Fang H., Shi Y., Li Y.Y., Liu R., Niu Q., Effect of temperature on the anaerobic digestion of cardboard with waste yeast added: dose-response kinetic assays, temperature coefficient and microbial co-metabolism, J. Clean. Prod., 275, (2020)
  • [9] Makamure F., Mukumba P., Makaka G., An analysis of bio-digester substrate heating methods: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., (2021)
  • [10] MNRE, Current Status | Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Government of India [WWW Document], (2021)
123