Mapping Uncertainty for Risk and Opportunity Assessment in Projects

被引:21
作者
Qazi A. [1 ]
Dikmen I. [2 ]
Birgonul M.T. [2 ]
机构
[1] American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
[2] Middle East Technical University, Turkey
来源
EMJ - Engineering Management Journal | 2020年 / 32卷 / 02期
关键词
Bayesian Belief Network; Decision Making & Risk Management; Influence Diagram; Loss and Opportunity Metrics; Operations Management; Program & Project Management; Risk and Opportunity; Risk Management; Uncertainty;
D O I
10.1080/10429247.2019.1664249
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Risk management is deemed as a critical process toward achieving the objectives of any project. A number of tools and techniques have been developed to help project managers reduce the risk involved in complex projects as risk is generally perceived as a negative event. However, uncertainty, which may lead to risk events may well result in opportunities. With the main aim of managing both risk and opportunity within an interdependent setting of interacting project uncertainties, we present a new thinking, called ‘uncertainty thinking’, a process model, a Bayesian Belief Network and Influence Diagram based modeling approach to implement uncertainty thinking in practice. We demonstrate the implementation of the developed uncertainty modeling approach through an illustrative case. We introduce new loss and opportunity metrics to help project managers prioritize uncertain variables within a network setting taking into account interdependencies and develop an optimization scheme for selecting loss reduction and opportunity exploitation strategies in accordance with the decision maker’s loss averse/gain seeking preferences. The results reveal the importance of modeling both risk and opportunity in managing project uncertainties as focusing only on the negative connotation of risk may result in selecting sub-optimal decisions. Furthermore, we also establish that minimization of the expected loss across a risk network does not necessarily maximize the expected gain. © 2019, © 2019 American Society for Engineering Management.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 97
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Ackermann F., Alexander J., Researching complex projects: Using causal mapping to take a systems perspective, International Journal of Project Management, 34, 6, pp. 891-901, (2016)
  • [2] Belton V., Stewart T.J., Value function methods: Practical basics, Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach, pp. 119-161, (2002)
  • [3] Budayan C., Dikmen I., Birgonul M.T., Ghaziani A., A computerized method for delay risk assessment based on fuzzy set theory using MS project™, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22, 8, pp. 2714-2725, (2018)
  • [4] Bu-Qammaz A.S., Dikmen I., Birgonul M.T., Risk assessment of international construction projects using the analytic network process, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 36, 7, pp. 1170-1181, (2009)
  • [5] Chapman C., Ward S., Why risk efficiency is a key aspect of best practice projects, International Journal of Project Management, 22, 8, pp. 619-632, (2004)
  • [6] Chapman C., Ward S., How to manage project opportunity and risk, (2011)
  • [7] Dikmen I., Birgonul M.T., An analytic hierarchy process based model for risk and opportunity assessment of international construction projects, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33, 1, pp. 58-68, (2006)
  • [8] Dikmen I., Birgonul M.T., Han S., Using fuzzy risk assessment to rate cost overrun risk in international construction projects, International Journal of Project Management, 25, 5, pp. 494-505, (2007)
  • [9] Dikmen I., Birgonul M.T., Ozorhon B., Project appraisal and selection using the analytic network process, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 34, 7, pp. 786-792, (2007)
  • [10] Dikmen I., Birgonul M.T., Tah J.H.M., Ozer A.H., Web-based risk assessment tool using integrated duration-cost influence network model, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138, 9, pp. 1023-1034, (2012)