Global sensitivity and design space of drag characteristics of parametric airship hull

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang Y. [1 ]
Wang X. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai
关键词
Latin hypercube sampling (LHS); Numerical simulation; PARSEC; Sobol global sensitivity analysis; Stratospheric airship;
D O I
10.11918/201909018
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To effectively reduce the dimension of the design parameters of airship hulls, improve the design efficiency, and provide reference and guidance for the design of airship hulls in the initial stage, an evaluation system was constructed for the airship hull shape parameters associated with drag coefficient sensitivity, combined with parametric section (PARSEC) method, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method, and Sobol global sensitivity analysis method based on variance. First, the outline of airship hull was described by PARSEC method which has clear physical significance. Then, the drag coefficient of airship hull samples produced by Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) was obtained by 2D axisymmetric CFD method. The accuracy of CFD method was verified by the experimental data of six typical streamlined bodies of revolution. Under the condition that the Reynolds number was consistent, the average relative error between the calculated and experimental drag coefficient was 1.5%. Finally, the sensitivity of the hull shape parameters was ranked by the Sobol global sensitivity analysis method. Research results show that the three parameters which were the most sensitive to the hull drag coefficient were the head radius rh, the maximum radius rd, and the maximum radius position xd. On the basis of this study, the design space of the airship hull shape was formed, and the design space has positive significance for improving the efficiency of designing process and reducing the aerodynamic drag of airships. Copyright ©2021 Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology.All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 61
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] ZHAO Da, LIU Dongxu, SUN Kangwen, Et al., Research status, technical difficulties and development trend of stratospheric airship, Acta Aerinautica et Astronautical Sinica, 37, 1, (2016)
  • [2] ANDROULAKAKIS S P, JUDY R A., Status and plans of high altitude airship (HAA<sup>TM</sup>) program, AIAA Lighter-Than-Air Systems Technology (LTA) Conference, (2013)
  • [3] ZHANG Yongdong, ZHAI Jiaqi, MENG Xiaojun, Et al., Approach for automatic testing of stratospheric airship test based on behavior logic, Acta Aerinautica et Astronautical Sinica, 39, 9, (2018)
  • [4] LI Tiane, SUN Xiaoying, WU Yue, Et al., Parameter analysis of aerodynamic drag force in stratospheric airship, Engineering Mechanics, 36, 1, (2019)
  • [5] LI Yuwen, NABON M, SHARF I., Airship dynamics modeling: A literature review, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 47, 3, (2011)
  • [6] CARRION M, BIAVA M, STEIJL R, Et al., CFD studies of Hybrid air vehicles, Proceedings of the 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, (2016)
  • [7] FENG Kai, ZHAO Da, MENG Xiaojun, Et al., Directional static stability analysis of an airship with auxiliary stabilizer, Journal of Astronautics, 39, 7, (2018)
  • [8] LUTZ T, WAGNER S., Drag reduction and shape optimization of airship bodies, Journal of Aircraft, 35, 3, (1998)
  • [9] WANG Xiaoliang, SHAN Xuexiong, Shape optimization of stratosphere airship, Journal of Aircraft, 43, 1, (2006)
  • [10] CERUTI A, GAMBACORTA D, MARZOCCA P., Unconventional hybrid airships design optimization accounting for added masses, Aerospace Science and Technology, 72, (2018)