Numerical simulation of Loss-of-Flow transient in the MYRRHA reactor

被引:0
|
作者
Koloszar L. [1 ]
Planquart P. [1 ]
van Tichelen K. [2 ]
Keijers S. [2 ]
机构
[1] von Karman Institute, Chaussée de Waterloo 72, Rhode-St-Genèse
[2] SCK·CEN, Boeretang 200, Mol
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
9;
D O I
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110675
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The current paper describes the loss of flow (LOF) transient investigated in the MYRRHA reactor by the means of Computational Fluid Dynamics. This scenario is starting from the nominal operation case then the two pumps stop simultaneously. An unsteady solution with resolved interface was considered with calculating conjugate heat transfer through the relevant structures. Due to a postulated event (e.g. loss of the electric grid) the pumps are not powered anymore stops. After the detection of the problem (temperature difference above the core rises with 20 degree) the reactor power is stopped by the safety rods (delay of 1 s). The fuel elements, however, continue to generate residual heat according to the decay heat curve. Due to the loss of the pumps, the pressure difference between the cold and the hot plenum is decreasing, which result in a gravitational flow equilibrating the two free surfaces to the same level. The objective of the work was to determine the flow through the core during the coast down of the pumps and eventual flow reversal into the pump/heat-exchanger box due to the gravitational flow. The simulation revealed that after losing power, the LBE flow reverses into the pumps in less than 0.1 s according to the simulations. In the core there is a brief moment of reverse flow, too, but only after the core is scrammed, therefore, the loss of cold LBE flow is not causing overheat. Once the core is scrammed, the position of the maximum temperature in the system shifts to the Above Core Structure, where the residual hot plume rising from the core impinges to the Above Core Upper Closure. The levels of the lower and upper plenum equilibrate roughly 20 s after the pump failure event. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CFD simulation of the IAEA 10 MW generic MTR reactor under loss of flow transient
    Salama, Amgad
    El-Morshedy, Salah El-Din
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2011, 38 (2-3) : 564 - 577
  • [32] CLADDING AND FUEL MOTION IN LOSS-OF-FLOW ACCIDENTS
    STEVENSON, MG
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1974, 19 (OCT27): : 277 - 278
  • [33] LOSS-OF-FLOW CALCULATIONS FOR CRBR DEMONSTRATION PLANT
    HUMMEL, HH
    KALIMULLAH
    PIZZICA, PA
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1975, 22 (NOV16): : 401 - 401
  • [34] Analysis of loss of offsite power and loss-of-flow accident of HFETR
    Sun, Shou-Hua
    Xu, Tao-Zhong
    Li, Zi-Yan
    Li, Jin-Song
    Deng, Cai-Yu
    Hedongli Gongcheng/Nuclear Power Engineering, 2013, 34 (04): : 111 - 113
  • [35] CFD analysis of flow blockage in MTR coolant channel under loss-of-flow transient: Hot channel scenario
    Salama, Amgad
    El-Morshedy, Salah El-Din
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2012, 55 : 78 - 92
  • [36] TRACE simulation of sodium boiling in pin bundle experiments under loss-of-flow conditions
    Chenu, A.
    Mikityuk, K.
    Chawla, R.
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2009, 239 (11) : 2417 - 2429
  • [37] LOSS-OF-FLOW TRANSIENT REACTOR TEST FACILITY TESTS L6 AND L7 WITH IRRADIATED LIQUID-METAL FAST BREEDER REACTOR TYPE FUEL
    SIMMS, R
    MARSH, GE
    ROTHMAN, AB
    STANFORD, GS
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 52 (03) : 331 - 341
  • [38] Numerical simulation of return flow in MOCVD reactor
    Zhang, Jiawen
    Gao, Hongkai
    Zhang, Jikang
    Yang, Yong
    Pan Tao Ti Hsueh Pao/Chinese Journal of Semiconductors, 1994, 15 (04): : 268 - 272
  • [39] LOSS-OF-FLOW ANALYSIS FOR PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS
    KEARNS, KD
    ROSSI, CE
    GEETS, JM
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1971, 14 (NAUG): : 39 - &
  • [40] FUEL MOTION IN EXPERIMENTS SIMULATING LIQUID-METAL FAST BREEDER REACTOR LOSS-OF-FLOW ACCIDENTS
    SIMMS, R
    STANFORD, GS
    FINK, CL
    REGIS, JP
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 55 (03) : 594 - 600