Static Measurement Experiment and Performance Analysis of GT-2A Airborne Gravimeter

被引：0

作者：

Liu Z. ^{[1
,2
]}

Li J. ^{[1
]}

Xiao X. ^{[3
]}

Zhang Q. ^{[2
]}

Wan J. ^{[1
]}

Li G. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan

[2] The First Geodetic Surveying Brigade of Ministry of Natural Resources, Xi'an

[3] Shaanxi Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation, Xi'an

来源：

Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University | 2019年 / 44卷 / 04期

关键词：

GT-2A; Resolving power; Scale factor; Tidal gravity; Zero drift rate;

D O I：

10.13203/j.whugis20170160

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

A static measurement experiment and an elevator-platform test of GT-2A have been designed to determine the zero drift rate, resolving power and scale factor of the instrument. We have calculated the drift rate with the static continuous observations from GT-2A and a relative gravimeter, as well as the tidal gravity from solid tide model. Considering solid tide correction, the zero drift rate of GT-2A observations decreases from -6.5 μGal/h to -0.1 μGal/h, while the representative error caused by using the zero drift rate from calibration measurement decreases from 7.2 μGal/h to 1.1 μGal/h. Thus, we can see that the solid tide has great influence on the determination of zero drift rate. With these data, the ability for GT-2A to monitor solid tide can be tested. The results from frequency domain analysis shows that the tidal components whose amplitude exceeds 30 μGal can be seen in the amplitude-frequency diagram, which means the resolving power of GT-2A is about 30 μGal. The observations of GT-2A from the elevator-platform test can be used to calculate the vertical gradient of gravity, which is then compared with the result measured by the relative gravimeter. Then the scale factor of the instrument has been determined to be -0.003 4±0.011 6. © 2019, Research and Development Office of Wuhan University. All right reserved.

引用

页码：482 / 488

页数：6

共 23 条

[1]

Klingele E.E., Cacard M., Kahle H.G., Kinematic GPS as a Source for Airborne Gravity Reduction in the Airborne Gravity Survey of Switzerland, Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, B4, pp. 7705-7715, (1997)

[2]

Abdelmoula F., New Concepts for Airborne Gravity Measurement, Aeros Sci Technol, 5, 6, pp. 413-424, (2001)

[3]

Zhou B., Luo Z., Ning J., Et al., Design of FIR Lowpass Digital Filters for Airborne Vector Gravimetry, Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 40, 6, pp. 772-778, (2015)

[4]

Gabell A., The GT-1A Mobile Gravimeter, ASEG-PESA Airborne Gravity 2004 Workshop, (2004)

[5]

Woodldridge A., Review of Modern Airborne Gravity Focusing on Results from GT-1A Surveys, First Break, 28, 5, pp. 85-92, (2010)

[6]

Ouyang Y., Deng K., Lu X., Et al., Tests of Multi-type Airborne Gravimeters and Data Analysis, Hydrographic Surveying and Charting, 33, 4, pp. 6-11, (2013)

[7]

Olsen D., GT-1A and GT-2A Airborne Gravimeters: Improvements in Design, Operation and Processing from 2003 to 2010, ASEG-PESA Airborne Gravity 2010 Workshop, (2010)

[8]

Sun Z., Li Y., Zhang S., Et al., Calibration of Scale Value for LaCoste & Romberg Airborne Gravimeter, Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 28, 2, pp. 132-135, (2008)

[9]

Qiu X., Zhang S., Sun J., Et al., Study on the Short Baseline Calibration of Scale Value for Airborne Gravimeter, Journal of Geomatics, 40, 5, pp. 59-61, (2015)

[10]

Sun Z., Xia Z., Li Y., Determination and Analysis of the Beam Scale Factor for the LaCoste & Romberg Airborne Gravimeter, Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 27, 4, pp. 367-371, (2002)

← 1 2 3 →