Enhanced uranium removal from aqueous solution by core–shell Fe0@Fe3O4: Insight into the synergistic effect of Fe0 and Fe3O4

被引:5
作者
Wang S. [1 ]
Hu J. [1 ]
Wang J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Laboratory of Environmental Technology, INET, Tsinghua University, Beijing
[2] Beijing Key Laboratory of Radioactive Wastes Treatment, Tsinghua University, Beijing
关键词
Ferroferric oxide; Radiation; Removal mechanism; Uranium; Zero-valent iron;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141730
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, Fe0@Fe3O4 was synthesized and used to remove U(VI) from groundwater. Different experimental conditions and cycling experiments were used to investigate the performance of Fe0@Fe3O4 in the U(VI) removal, and the XRD, TEM, XPS and XANES techniques were employed to characterize the Fe0@Fe3O4. The results showed that the U(VI) removal efficiency of Fe0@Fe3O4 was 48.5 mg/g that was higher than the sum of removal efficiency of Fe0 and Fe3O4. The uranium on the surface of Fe0@Fe3O4 mainly existed as U(IV), followed by U(VI) and U(V). The Fe0 content decreased after reaction, while the Fe3O4 content increased. Based on the results of experiments and characterization, the enhanced removal efficiency of Fe0@Fe3O4 was attributed to the synergistic effect of Fe0 and Fe3O4 in which Fe3O4 accelerated the Fe0 corrosion that promoted the progressively formation of Fe(II) that promoted the reduction of adsorbed U(VI) to U(IV) and incorporated U(VI) to U(V). The performance of Fe0@Fe3O4 at near-neutrality condition was better than at acidic and alkalic conditions. The chloride ions, sulfate ions and nitrate ions showed minor effect on the Fe0@Fe3O4 performance, while carbonate ions exhibited significant inhibition. The metal cations showed different effect on the Fe0@Fe3O4 performance. The removal efficiency of Fe0@Fe3O4 decreased with the number of cycling experiment. Ionizing radiation could regenerate the used Fe0@Fe3O4. This study provides insight into the U(VI) removal by Fe0@Fe3O4 in aqueous solution. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Awad A.M., Jalab R., Benamor A., Nasser M.S., Ba-Abbad M.M., El-Naas M., Mohammad A.W., Adsorption of organic pollutants by nanomaterial-based adsorbents: an overview, J. Mol. Liq., 301, (2020)
[2]  
Bi E., Bowen I., Devlin J.F., Effect of mixed anions (HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>−SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>−ClO<sub>4</sub><sup>−</sup>) on granular iron (Fe<sup>0</sup>) reactivity, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 15, pp. 5975-5981, (2009)
[3]  
Burgos W.D., Senko J.M., Dempsey B.A., Roden E.E., Stone J.J., Kemner K.M., Kelly S.D., Soil humic acid decreases biological uranium (VI) reduction by Shewanella putrefaciens CN32, Environ. Eng. Sci., 24, 6, pp. 755-761, (2007)
[4]  
Chen C., Hu J., Wang J.L., Biosorption of uranium by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae, J. Environ. Radioact., 213, (2020)
[5]  
Chen C., Wang J.L., Uranium removal by novel graphene oxide-immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae gel beads, J. Environ. Radioact., 162, pp. 134-145, (2016)
[6]  
Chen H., Wang J.L., Catalytic ozonation of sulfamethoxazole over Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>/Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> composites, Chemosphere, 234, pp. 14-24, (2019)
[7]  
Chen L., Liu J., Zhang W., Zhou J., Luo D., Li Z., Uranium (U) source, speciation, uptake, toxicity and bioremediation strategies in soil-plant system: a review, J. Hazard Mater., 413, (2021)
[8]  
Cheng F., Wang J.L., Removal of bisphenol A from wastewater by adsorption and membrane separation: performances and mechanisms, Chem. Eng. J., 484, (2024)
[9]  
Cheng R., Wang J.L., Zhang W.X., Comparison of reductive dechlorination of p-chlorophenol using Fe-0 and nanosized Fe<sup>0</sup>, J. Hazard Mater., 144, pp. 334-339, (2007)
[10]  
Cui D., Spahiu K., The reduction of U(VI) on corroded iron under anoxic conditions, Radiochim. Acta, 90, pp. 623-628, (2002)