Review of the evaluation methods of equipment system of systems facing the contribution rate

被引：7
|
作者：
Yang K. [1 ]
Yang Z. [1 ]
Tan Y. [1 ]
Zhao Q. [1 ]
机构：
[1] College of System Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha
来源：
Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics | 2019年 / 41卷 / 02期
关键词：
Equipment system of systems; Operation loops; Operation utility; The evaluation on the contribution rate;
D O I：
10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2019.02.13
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
From the perspective of the evaluation on the contribution rate of weapon system of systems, this article summarizes the current research status and the technical difficulties in this research field. More specifically, the methods based on the combat loop, complex network, evidence reasoning, gray target theory, Bayes network, the structural equation model, exploratory analysis etc. are used to evaluate the contribution rate of weapon equipment system of systems. Furthermore, their advantages and disadvantages are compared and analyzed. Base on the comparisons, the method based on operation loops and complex networks which takes into consideration the relations between different weapons is able to assess the contribution of the weapon equipment in multiple dimensions. Hence, this method can provide more scientific and reasonable results to decision makers. © 2019, Editorial Office of Systems Engineering and Electronics. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：311 / 321
页数：10
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Liu X.L., Research on assessment method of the impact of technology introduction on weapon equipment system capability, (2009)
  • [2] Li J.C., Yang K.W., Zhang X.K., Et al., Equipment contribution degree evaluation method based on combat network of weapon system-of-systems, Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 13, 3, pp. 1-7, (2016)
  • [3] Luo X., Yang J., He R., Et al., Research and demonstration on contribution evaluation of weapon equipment system based on task-capability-structare-evolution, Journal of Equipment Academy, 27, 3, pp. 7-13, (2016)
  • [4] Li W., Zhang H., Wang W., An evaluation method for the contribution margin of a ship in the combat system of systems, Ship Science and Technology, 37, 10, pp. 1-5, (2015)
  • [5] Li Y.Y., Li Z., Guan Q.B., Et al., Discussion and demonstration on contribution evaiuation of weapon equipment system, Journal of Equipment Academy, 26, 4, pp. 5-10, (2015)
  • [6] Han Z.G., Research on ship assessment index system and evaluation method, (2008)
  • [7] Lou P.C., Fu P.F., Zhou J.L., Framework to evaluate the combat capability of weapons SoS, Systems Engineering and Electronics, 27, 1, pp. 72-75, (2005)
  • [8] Lu Y.J., Evaluation method and application of weapon equipment system operational capability based on architectural relation analysis, (2012)
  • [9] Zhao X.A., Research on requirement development method of weapon equipment system based on multi-view, pp. 42-47, (2010)
  • [10] Zhu F., Han X.M., Nan H.Y., Combat capability evaluation of air defense missile anti-near space weapon, Fire Control & Command Control, 42, 3, pp. 8-12, (2017)
12345678