Comparison of Conditioned Radial Basis Function Approach and Kriging: Estimation of Calorific Value in a Coal Field

被引：0
作者：
Atalay F. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Hacettepe University, Mining Engineering Department, Ankara
来源：
Scientific Mining Journal | 2023年 / 62卷 / 02期
关键词：
Coal; Geostatistics; Kriging; Radial basis function;
D O I：
10.30797/MADENCILIK.1315628
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Due to low production cost, coal is still the most important source of electricity production worldwide. This important position of coal also makes the evaluation of coal resources important. One of the most important attributes to be assessed in this evaluation is estimating the calorific value distribution of deposit. In geostatistical estimation currently kriging and its variants are being used widely. Alternatively new techniques are being developed and one of them is the Radial Based Functions based method. In this study, Conditioned Radial Basis Function (CRBF) is used to estimate the calorific value distribution of a coal deposit while estimations are also performed with ordinary kriging (OK). Results of both estimation methods are compared with respect to composite calorific values. Results show that CRBF produced a higher estimation range than OK with closer mean to composite. However, like OK, results are still smoother than the composite values. © 2023 Union of Chambers of Engineers and Architects of Turkey. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：93 / 98
页数：5
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Afzal P., Comparing ordinary kriging and advanced inverse distance squared methods based on estimating coal deposits
  • [2] case study: East-Parvadeh deposit, central Iran, J Min Environ, 9, pp. 753-760, (2018)
  • [3] Atalay F, Tercan A.E., Coal resource estimation using Gaussian copula, Int J Coal Geol, 175, pp. 1-9, (2017)
  • [4] Atalay F., Unal M. S., Killioglu S. Y., Comparison of Radial Basis Function and Ordinary Kriging Estimations in an Iron Ore Deposit, Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 27, pp. 303-310, (2021)
  • [5] Cressie N., The origins of kriging, Math Geol, 22, pp. 239-252, (1990)
  • [6] Chelgani S. C., Estimation of gross calorific value based on coal analysis using an explainable artificial intelligence, Machine Learning with Applications, 6, (2021)
  • [7] Demirel I.H., Sarac C., Sen O., Geostatistical reserve estimation: A case study in the Canakci coal seam of Ermenek Basin, Turkey, Energy sources, 22, pp. 925-933, (2000)
  • [8] Ertunc G., Tercan A.E., Hindistan M. A., Unver B., Unal S., Atalay F., Killioglu S.Y., Geostatistical estimation of coal quality variables by using covariance matching constrained kriging, Int J Coal Geol, 112, pp. 14-25, (2013)
  • [9] Fang J.H., Starks T.H., Mattern J., Geostatistical Approach in Coal Resource Estimation, AAPG Bulletin, 64, (1980)
  • [10] Hardy R. L., Multiquadratic equations of topography and other irregular surfaces, J. Geophys. Res, 76, pp. 1905-1915, (1971)
1234