A perspective on machine learning methods in turbulence modeling

被引：79

作者：

Beck A. ^{[1
]}

Kurz M. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Laboratory of Fluid Dynamics and Technical Flows, University of Magdeburg “Otto von Guericke”, Magdeburg

[2] Institute of Aerodynamics and Gas Dynamics, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart

来源：

GAMM Mitteilungen | 2021年 / 44卷 / 01期

关键词：

closure models; LES; machine learning; RANS; turbulence simulation;

D O I：

10.1002/gamm.202100002

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This work presents a review of the current state of research in data-driven turbulence closure modeling. It offers a perspective on the challenges and open issues but also on the advantages and promises of machine learning (ML) methods applied to parameter estimation, model identification, closure term reconstruction, and beyond, mostly from the perspective of large Eddy simulation and related techniques. We stress that consistency of the training data, the model, the underlying physics, and the discretization is a key issue that needs to be considered for a successful ML-augmented modeling strategy. In order to make the discussion useful for non-experts in either field, we introduce both the modeling problem in turbulence as well as the prominent ML paradigms and methods in a concise and self-consistent manner. In this study, we present a survey of the current data-driven model concepts and methods, highlight important developments, and put them into the context of the discussed challenges. © 2021 The Authors. GAMM - Mitteilungen published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.

引用

共 91 条

[1]

Abadi M., Agarwal A., Barham P., Brevdo E., Chen Z., Citro C., Corrado G.S., Davis A., Dean J., Devin M., Ghemawat S., Goodfellow I., Harp A., Irving G., Isard M., Jia Y., Jozefowicz R., Kaiser L., Kudlur M., Levenberg J., Mane D., Monga R., Moore S., Murray D., Olah C., Schuster M., Shlens J., Steiner B., Sutskever I., Talwar K., Tucker P., Vanhoucke V., Vasudevan V., Viegas F., Vinyals O., Warden P., Wattenberg M., Wicke M., Yu Y., Zheng X., TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heteroge

[2]

Alcala J., Timofeyev I., Subgrid-scale parametrization of unresolved scales in forced burgers equation using generative adversarial networks (gan), (2020)

[3]

Arthur D., Vassilvitskii S., k-means++: The advantages of careful seeding, Technical report 2006-13, Stanford InfoLab, (2006)

[4]

Batchelor G.K., The theory of homogeneous turbulence, (1953)

[5]

Beck A., Flad D., Munz C.D., Deep neural networks for data-driven LES closure models, J. Comput. Phys., 398, (2019)

[6]

Beck A.D., Zeifang J., Schwarz A., Flad D.G., A neural network based shock detection and localization approach for discontinuous Galerkin methods, J. Comput. Phys., 423, (2020)

[7]

Ben-Hur A., Horn D., Siegelmann H.T., Vapnik V., Support vector clustering, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 2, pp. 125-137, (2001)

[8]

Boser B.E., Guyon I.M., Vapnik V.N., A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers, Proceedings of the 5th Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 144-152, (1992)

[9]

Brunton S.L., Noack B.R., Koumoutsakos P., Machine learning for fluid mechanics, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 52, pp. 477-508, (2020)

[10]

Campbell M., Hoane A.J., Hsu F., Deep blue, Artif. Intell., 134, pp. 57-83, (2002)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 →