Nonlinear network connectedness: Assessing financial risk transmission in MENA and influence of external financial conditions

被引:4
作者
Balcilar, Mehmet [1 ]
Usman, Ojonugwa [2 ,3 ]
Duman, Gazi Murat [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Haven, Dept Econ & Business Analyt, 300 Boston Post Rd, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
[2] Istanbul Ticaret Univ, Dept Econ, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Lebanese Amer Univ, Adnan Kassar Sch Business, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Financial connectedness; Risk transmission; Economic uncertainty; Financial conditions; Regime switching; MENA; UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY-POLICY; UNCERTAINTY SHOCKS; SYSTEMIC RISK; SPILLOVER; DYNAMICS; STRESS; CONTAGION; COUNTRIES; INDEXES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101186
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study investigates the influence of global financial market conditions on financial risk connectedness and transmission among the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) economies. Utilizing weekly realized stock market volatilities as a measure of risk and employing a smooth transition threshold vector autoregressive (STVAR) model to analyze risk transmission under varying levels of financial stress, the authors also examine the impact of external macroeconomic conditions on the risk connectedness of MENA economies. The results indicate that the overall connectedness, based on a standard VAR model, is moderate at 48.34%. However, in the low financial stress regime, overall connectedness increases to 52.79%, and in the high financial stress regime, it rises to 72.94%, indicating stronger risk interdependency among MENA countries during times of high stress. In the high financial stress regime, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates are identified as net risk transmitters among MENA countries. The study also reveals that risk transmission across MENA is more pronounced in the regime-dependent model compared to the overall mean-based VAR model.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Oil price fluctuations and economic growth: the case of MENA countries [J].
Abdelsalam, Mamdouh Abdelmoula Mohamed .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 8 (05) :353-379
[2]   Systemic Risk and Stability in Financial Networks [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Ozdaglar, Asuman ;
Tahbaz-Salehi, Alireza .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (02) :564-608
[3]   Financial regimes and uncertainty shocks [J].
Alessandri, Piergiorgio ;
Mumtaz, Haroon .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2019, 101 :31-46
[4]   Testing multiple equation systems for common nonlinear components [J].
Anderson, HM ;
Vahid, F .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1998, 84 (01) :1-36
[5]   Measuring Financial Contagion and Spillover Effects with a State-Dependent Sensitivity Value-at-Risk Model [J].
Andries, Alin Marius ;
Galasan, Elena .
RISKS, 2020, 8 (01)
[6]  
Arellano C., 2012, Feder. Res. Bank Minneapolis Res. Depart. Staff Report 466
[7]   Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy [J].
Auerbach, Alan J. ;
Gorodnichenko, Yuriy .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2012, 4 (02) :1-27
[8]  
Bahmani-Oskooee M, 2017, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, V23, P73, DOI [10.1080/10835547.2017.12089999, 10.1080/10835547.2017.12089999, DOI 10.1080/10835547.2017.12089999]
[9]  
Baker SR, 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3363862, 10.3386/w25720, DOI 10.3386/W25720]
[10]   Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty [J].
Baker, Scott R. ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Davis, Steven J. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 131 (04) :1593-1636