" Carbon " boards and transition risk: Explicit and implicit exposure implications for total stock returns and dividends payouts

被引:3
作者
Mazzarano, Matteo [1 ]
Guastella, Gianni [2 ]
Pareglio, Stefano [2 ]
Xepapadeas, Anastasios [3 ,4 ]
Borghesi, Simone [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, Dept Polit & Int Sci, Via PA Mattioli 10, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Math & Phys, Brescia, Italy
[3] Athens Univ Econ & Business, Dept Int & European Econ Studies, Athens, Greece
[4] Univ Bologna, Dept Econ, Bologna, Italy
[5] European Univ Inst, Florence Sch Regulat Climate, Florence, Italy
关键词
G35; G32; G38; Q54; Climate risk; Transition risk; SEC-10K; Mandatory disclosure; Text analysis; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; FIRM-VALUE; PERFORMANCE; INFORMATION; DISCLOSURE; POLICY; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107779
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Transition risk disclosure facilitates investors' understanding of the potential company-level risks associated with a low-carbon transition. Among the others, stricter regulations could undermine companies' financial performances, affecting operations costs and revenues and their impact being proportional to the business carbon intensity. Transition risk disclosure takes two forms. One is a textual description of transition risk in compulsory and voluntary non-financial disclosure. The other is the disclosure of carbon emissions and intensity, which is implicitly associated with transition risk exposure. We empirically assess the impact of the two transition risk measures on shareholder returns to test the "carbon premium" hypothesis. We consider shareholder return as the sum of capital gain and dividend paid and analyse the impact of transition risk on both. Evidence supports the "carbon premium" hypothesis but suggests such a premium is transferred to shareholders primarily via dividend payouts. One possible explanation consistent with this evidence is that boards in highly polluting companies use dividends to compensate investors for the relatively lower capital gain, dissuading them from divesting due to low returns, stigmatisation effects and regulatory risks.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [51] DIVIDEND POLICY UNDER ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION
    MILLER, MH
    ROCK, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1985, 40 (04) : 1031 - 1051
  • [52] Nguyen J.H., 2020, SSRN Electron. J., DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3669660
  • [53] Perez-Gonzalez F., 2002, SSRN Electron. J., DOI [10.2139/ssrn.337640, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.337640]
  • [54] The Effect of IPCC Reports and Regulatory Announcements on the Stock Market
    Rogova, Elena
    Aprelkova, Galina
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (08)
  • [55] Rozeff M., 1982, J FINANC RES, V5, P249
  • [56] Firm-Level Climate Change Exposure
    Sautner, Zacharias
    Van Lent, Laurence
    Vilkov, Grigory
    Zhang, Ruishen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2023, : 1449 - 1498
  • [57] What Determines TSR
    Stewart, Bennett
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CORPORATE FINANCE, 2014, 26 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [58] Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, 2017, Climate Risk Technical Bulletin
  • [59] Too Little or too much? Exploring U-shaped Relationships between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Financial Performance
    Trumpp, Christoph
    Guenther, Thomas
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 26 (01) : 49 - 68
  • [60] Loss and damage in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (Working Group II): a text-mining analysis
    van der Geest, Kees
    Warner, Koko
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2020, 20 (06) : 729 - 742