Imbricated to Platforms: The (Re)production of Differences in Food-delivery Work

被引:0
作者
Bonifacio, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
来源
TECNOSCIENZA-ITALIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY STUDIES | 2024年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
digital platforms; algorithms; food -delivery work; ethnography; imbrication; SOCIOMATERIALITY; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.6092/issn.2038-3460/18515
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
The debate on digital labour platforms (DLPs) postulates that algorithms engineer pervasive organizational control, but it often observes that work-ers can evade and resist this control by manipulating algorithms' decisions. This article aims to unpack this dichotomic view, shedding light on the more intricate dynamics at play in the everyday interaction between work-ers, algorithms and related technologies in the context of food-delivery platforms. Based on a seven-months ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Milan in 2020, during which the author worked as a food-delivery courier, this article highlights the internal differentiation within an emerging occu-pational field that is often considered homogeneous. First, it compares two food-delivery platforms - Glovo and Deliveroo - to uncover differences in the way they prefigure couriers' work, enabling or constraining their agency. Second, it illustrates how two groups of workers with uneven cultural and socioeconomic resources engage with both platforms. The analysis shows that pre-existing social stratification of workers is reproduced through the processes of "imbrication to platform", leading to the emergence of differ-ent ways of working and dispositions - namely, reactive and strategic. In conclusion, however, it is argued that strategic "imbrications" result less in practices of resistance to organizational control and more into self-optimi-zation tactics that, to some extent, are envisaged and tolerated by DLPs.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 38
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Akrich M., 1992, SHAPING TECHNOLOGY B, P205, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1365-2621.1989.TB07952.X
  • [2] Organizations Decentered: Data Objects, Technology and Knowledge
    Alaimo, Cristina
    Kallinikos, Jannis
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2022, 33 (01) : 19 - 37
  • [3] Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter
    Barad, K
    [J]. SIGNS, 2003, 28 (03): : 801 - 831
  • [4] E-mail as a Source and Symbol of Stress
    Barley, Stephen R.
    Meyerson, Debra E.
    Grodal, Stine
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (04) : 887 - 906
  • [5] Bonifacio F., 2023, Fare il rider: Pratiche, saperi e traiettorie di una professione emergente
  • [6] Cooperative affordances: How instant messaging apps afford learning, resistance and solidarity among food delivery workers
    Bonini, Tiziano
    Trere, Emiliano
    Yu, Zizheng
    Singh, Swati
    Cargnelutti, Daniele
    Lopez-Ferrandez, Francisco Javier
    [J]. CONVERGENCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH INTO NEW MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 30 (01): : 554 - 571
  • [7] "IT OBLIGES YOU TO DO THINGS YOU NORMALLY WOULDN'T": ORGANIZING AND CONSUMING PRIVATE LIFE IN THE AGE OF AIRBNB
    Bruni, Attila
    Esposito, Fabio Maria
    [J]. PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO, 2019, 12 (03) : 665 - 690
  • [8] THE SOCIOMATERIALITY OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS: CURRENT STATUS, FUTURE DIRECTIONS
    Cecez-Kecmanovic, Dubravka
    Galliers, Robert D.
    Henfridsson, Ola
    Newell, Sue
    Vidgen, Richard
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 2014, 38 (03) : 809 - 830
  • [9] Fissures in algorithmic power: platforms, code, and contestation
    Ferrari, Fabian
    Graham, Mark
    [J]. CULTURAL STUDIES, 2021, 35 (4-5) : 814 - 832
  • [10] Power in Management and Organization Science
    Fleming, Peter
    Spicer, Andre
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2014, 8 (01) : 237 - 298