Returning individual research results to participants: Values, preferences, and expectations

被引:0
作者
Kent, Denise A. [1 ,2 ]
Villegas-Downs, Michelle [3 ]
Del Rios, Marina [4 ]
Freedman, Michael [2 ]
Krishnan, Jerry A. [2 ,5 ]
Menchaca, Martha G. [6 ]
Patil, Crystal L. [7 ]
Sculley, Jenny [5 ]
Tintle, Nathan [8 ]
Gerald, Lynn B. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Biobehav Nursing Sci, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Breathe Chicago Ctr, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care Sleep & Allergy, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Human Dev Nursing Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Emergency Med, Iowa City, IA USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Off Populat Hlth Sci, Off Vice Chancellor Hlth Affairs, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Sch Nursing, Dept Hlth Behav & Biol Sci, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[8] Univ Illinois, Dept Populat Hlth Nursing Sci, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Return of individual research results; recruitment; retention; engagement research benefits; trust in research; participant-centered research;
D O I
10.1017/cts.2024.568
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background/objective: Disclosing individual research results to participants is not standard practice. The return of individual research results to participants may increase recruitment, retention, and engagement in research. This study's objective was to explore the preferences, expectations, and experiences of research participants receiving individual research results. Methods: A mixed-methods approach, consisting of semi-structured interviews and a health literacy assessment, was used with participants enrolled in a cohort study. The interviews were analyzed to produce an understanding of current experiences. Using descriptive analyses, responses were compared to identify alignments and divergences among participants. Results: Forty-three English-speaking and 16 Spanish-speaking participants enrolled. Ninety-eight percent of participants wanted to receive their individual research results. Seventy-five percent of participants reported they shared results with their healthcare providers. More participants aged 18-65 reported the need to follow up with their provider (70%) as compared to participants > 65 (20%). Two-thirds of participants reported a positive experience receiving their research results; however, 22% reported anxiety and worry. Most participants (69%) described the electronic medical record (EMR) as their preferred method for receiving their results. Yet only 50% of Spanish speakers preferred receiving research results through the EMR compared to 77% of English speakers. Participants with low health literacy preferred receiving study results in person or by phone. Conclusion: Research participants value receiving their individual research results, and this may increase recruitment and retention within the research enterprise. While more research is needed, the lessons learned from this study lay the groundwork for developing best practices and policies around the return of individual research results.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Returning study results to research participants: Data access, format, and sharing preferences
    Mangal, Sabrina
    de Rivera, Stephanie Nino
    Choi, Jacky
    Turchioe, Meghan Reading
    Benda, Natalie
    Sharko, Marianne
    Myers, Annie
    Goyal, Parag
    Dugdale, Lydia
    Creber, Ruth Masterson
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 170
  • [2] Principles and practices of returning individual research results to participants in large studies of pregnancy and childhood
    Mash, Clay
    Mcallister, Kimberly A.
    Wonnum, Sundania
    Vargas, Ashley J.
    Dowling, Gaya
    Arteaga, S. Sonia
    Blaisdell, Carol J.
    Hardy, Kristina K.
    Das, Irene Prabhu
    Raju, Tonse N. K.
    Gillman, Matthew W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [3] Communicating Alzheimer's biomarker results to cognitively unimpaired research participants: Satisfaction, utility, and impact on research attitudes
    Erickson, Claire M.
    Ketchum, Fred B.
    Basche, Kristin E.
    Chin, Nathaniel A.
    Eveler, Marcella L.
    Clark, Lindsay R.
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA-TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH & CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 10 (02)
  • [4] Adolescent perspectives on the return of individual results in genomic addiction research
    Coors, Marilyn E.
    Raymond, Kristen M.
    McWilliams, Shannon K.
    Hopfer, Christian J.
    Mikulich-Gilbertson, Susan K.
    PSYCHIATRIC GENETICS, 2015, 25 (03) : 127 - 130
  • [5] Hold on to your study participants: Why nurses, study coordinators and retention matters in haemophilia clinical trials, results from a global survey among 87 research nurses and study coordinators
    Mulders, Greta
    Barazani-Brutman, Tami
    Belem, Kelly
    Benjamin, Christopher
    Wakefield, Cindy
    Williams, Nicola
    Wongwerawattanakoon, Pakawan
    Zhong, Huiqin
    Kair, Kate
    Sorensen, Hanne Thykaer
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2022, 28 : 52 - 52