Strategies to improve fairness in artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review

被引:1
作者
Trigo, Antonio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stein, Nubia [2 ]
Belfo, Fernando Paulo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Univ Lisboa ISCTE IUL, ISTAR, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Polytech Univ Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Polytech Univ Coimbra, CEOS PP Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Artificial intelligence; fairness; fairness techniques; fairness metrics; systematic literature review; AI;
D O I
10.3233/EFI-240045
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Decisions based on artificial intelligence can reproduce biases or prejudices present in biased historical data and poorly formulated systems, presenting serious social consequences for underrepresented groups of individuals. This paper presents a systematic literature review of technical, feasible, and practicable solutions to improve fairness in artificial intelligence classified according to different perspectives: fairness metrics, moment of intervention (pre-processing, processing, or post-processing), research area, datasets, and algorithms used in the research. The main contribution of this paper is to establish common ground regarding the techniques to be used to improve fairness in artificial intelligence, defined as the absence of bias or discrimination in the decisions made by artificial intelligence systems.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 346
页数:24
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]   Strategic Best Response Fairness in Fair Machine Learning [J].
Shimao, Hajime ;
Khern-am-nuai, Warut ;
Kannan, Karthik ;
Cohen, Maxime C. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY, AIES 2022, 2022, :664-664
[42]   A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indices [J].
Speicher, Till ;
Heidari, Hoda ;
Grgic-Hlaca, Nina ;
Gummadi, Krishna P. ;
Singla, Adish ;
Weller, Adrian ;
Zafar, Muhammad Bilal .
KDD'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, 2018, :2239-2248
[43]   Biases in AI Systems [J].
Srinivasan, Ramya ;
Chander, Ajay .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2021, 64 (08) :44-49
[44]   Slice Tuner: A Selective Data Acquisition Framework for Accurate and Fair Machine Learning Models [J].
Tae, Ki Hyun ;
Whang, Steven Euijong .
SIGMOD '21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF DATA, 2021, :1771-1783
[45]   AN FDA FOR ALGORITHMS [J].
Tutt, Andrew .
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW, 2017, 69 (01) :83-123
[46]   How fair can we go in machine learning? Assessing the boundaries of accuracy and fairness [J].
Valdivia, Ana ;
Sanchez-Monedero, Javier ;
Casillas, Jorge .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 36 (04) :1619-1643
[47]  
Verma S, 2018, 2018 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFTWARE FAIRNESS (FAIRWARE 2018), P1, DOI [10.23919/FAIRWARE.2018.8452913, 10.1145/3194770.3194776]
[48]  
Von Hohendorff R., 2021, RDUno: Revista Do Programa de Pos-Graduacao Em Direito Da Unochapeco, V3, P15, DOI [10.46699/rduno.v3i4.6072, DOI 10.46699/RDUNO.V3I4.6072]
[49]   In-Processing Modeling Techniques for Machine Learning Fairness: A Survey [J].
Wan, Mingyang ;
Zha, Daochen ;
Liu, Ninghao ;
Zou, Na .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY FROM DATA, 2022, 17 (03)
[50]   Chatbots in libraries: A systematic literature review [J].
Yan, Rumeng ;
Zhao, Xin ;
Mazumdar, Suvodeep .
EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION, 2023, 39 (04) :431-449