Polycentric governance, epistocracy and the limits of policing knowledge in preparing for the climate crisis

被引:0
作者
Malik, Ali [1 ]
Berg, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Law, Leeds, England
[2] Univ Glasgow, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Glasgow City, Scotland
关键词
LRFs; epistocracy; polycentric governance; policing and the climate crisis; emergency planning; POLITICS; RESILIENCE; COMMUNITIES; EXCHANGE; SECURITY; SCIENCE; STATE; HARM;
D O I
10.1080/10439463.2024.2389961
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The last two decades have seen an increase in the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events, placing complex demands on police and emergency services in the UK. Despite the growing recognition of the cascading and multidimensional threats, there is limited understanding of how policing and local governance actors are preparing for the climate crisis. In this paper, we argue that polycentric governance approaches, such as the Local Resilience Forums (LRFs), provide an essential focal point for emergency planning and disaster response activity that is rooted in localised contexts. However, while the LRFs are designed to benefit from the inclusion of a broad range of actors, dominant mentalities, knowledge hierarchies and powerful actors may limit their epistemic potential. We propose that a pathway towards a resilient and adaptive policing agenda for the Anthropocene necessitates acknowledging the limits of policing knowledge, expertise and traditional command-and-control mentalities. We draw on the notion of epistocracy to propose a policy and research agenda for police and partner agencies to harness the epistemic potential of LRFs. By adopting approaches to leverage pluralised forms of knowledge and identifying strategies for co-opting community-based actors in emergency planning and response activities, police and partner agencies can strengthen local capacity-building and better promote local resilience and adaptation efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 115 条
[22]  
Casey L., 2023, INDEPENDENT REV STAN
[23]  
Clear Todd., 2007, IMPRISONING COMMUNIT
[24]   Knowledge governance for the Anthropocene: Pluralism, populism, and decision-making [J].
Clement, Sarah .
GLOBAL POLICY, 2022, 13 :11-23
[25]  
Coaffee J., 2006, European Legacy - Journal of the International Society for the Study of European Ideas, V11, P389
[26]   Constructing resilience through security and surveillance: The politics, practices and tensions of security-driven resilience [J].
Coaffee, Jon ;
Fussey, Pete .
SECURITY DIALOGUE, 2015, 46 (01) :86-105
[27]   Rescaling and Responsibilising the Politics of Urban Resilience: From National Security to Local Place-Making [J].
Coaffee, Jon .
POLITICS, 2013, 33 (04) :240-252
[28]  
College of Policing, 2024, Emergency planning: Command, control and coordination online
[29]  
Crawford A., 2018, Criminology and the anthropocene, P153
[30]   Vulnerability and Policing: Rethinking the Role and Limits of the Police [J].
Crawford, Adam .
POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2024, 95 (03) :431-441