Prior Negative Biopsy, PSA Density, and Anatomic Location Impact Cancer Detection Rate of MRI-Targeted PI-RADS Index Lesions

被引:0
作者
Alzubaidi, Ahmad N. [1 ]
Zheng, Amy [2 ]
Said, Mohammad [3 ]
Fan, Xuanjia [2 ]
Maidaa, Michael [4 ]
Owens, R. Grant [3 ]
Yudovich, Max [1 ]
Pursnani, Suraj [1 ]
Owens, R. Scott [5 ]
Stringer, Thomas [4 ]
Tracy, Chad R. [3 ]
Raman, Jay D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[2] Penn State Coll Med, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[3] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Urol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[5] UPMC Cent Hosp, Camphill, PA 17011 USA
关键词
fusion prostate biopsy; PI-RADS; magnetic resonance imaging; PSA density; PROSTATE-CANCER; STATISTICS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.3390/curroncol31080329
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: MRI fusion prostate biopsy has improved the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSC). Continued refinements in predicting the pre-biopsy probability of CSC are essential for optimal patient counseling. We investigated potential factors related to improved cancer detection rates (CDR) of CSC in patients with PI-RADS >= 3 lesions. Methods: The pathology of 980 index lesions in 980 patients sampled by transrectal mpMRI-targeted prostate biopsy across four medical centers between 2017-2020 was reviewed. PI-RADS lesion distribution included 291 PI-RADS-5, 374 PI-RADS-4, and 315 PI-RADS-3. We compared CDR of index PI-RADS >= 3 lesions based on location (TZ) vs. (PZ), PSA density (PSAD), and history of prior negative conventional transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS). Results: Mean age, PSA, prostate volume, and level of prior negative TRUS biopsy were 66 years (43-90), 7.82 ng/dL (5.6-11.2), 54 cm(3) (12-173), and 456/980 (46.5%), respectively. Higher PSAD, no prior history of negative TRUS biopsy, and PZ lesions were associated with higher CDR. Stratified CDR highlighted significant variance across subgroups. CDR for a PI-RADS-5 score, PZ lesion with PSAD >= 0.15, and prior negative biopsy was 77%. Conversely, the CDR rate for a PI-RADS-4 score, TZ lesion with PSAD < 0.15, and prior negative biopsy was significantly lower at 14%. Conclusions: For index PI-RADS >= 3 lesions, CDR varied significantly based on location, prior history of negative TRUS biopsy, and PSAD. Such considerations are critical when counseling on the merits and potential yield of prostate needle biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:4406 / 4413
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
acrin, About us
[2]   Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study [J].
Ahdoot, Michael ;
Lebastchi, Amir H. ;
Long, Lori ;
Wilbur, Andrew R. ;
Gomella, Patrick T. ;
Mehralivand, Sherif ;
Daneshvar, Michael A. ;
Yerram, Nitin K. ;
O'Connor, Luke P. ;
Wang, Alex Z. ;
Gurram, Sandeep ;
Bloom, Jonathan ;
Siddiqui, M. Minhaj ;
Linehan, W. Marston ;
Merino, Maria ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Pinsky, Paul ;
Parnes, Howard ;
Shih, Joanna H. ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Wood, Bradford J. ;
Pinto, Peter A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2022, 5 (02) :176-186
[3]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[4]   Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy [J].
Borghesi, Marco ;
Ahmed, Hashim ;
Nam, Robert ;
Schaeffer, Edward ;
Schiavina, Riccardo ;
Taneja, Samir ;
Weidner, Wolfgang ;
Loeb, Stacy .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (03) :353-365
[5]   PROMIS - Prostate MR imaging study: A paired validating cohort study evaluating the role of multi-parametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer [J].
Bosaily, A. El-Shater ;
Parker, C. ;
Brown, L. C. ;
Gabe, R. ;
Hindley, R. G. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Emberton, M. ;
Ahmed, H. U. .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 42 :26-40
[6]   PSA-density does not improve bi-parametric prostate MR detection of prostate cancer in a biopsy naive patient population [J].
Cuocolo, Renato ;
Stanzione, Arnaldo ;
Rusconi, Giovanni ;
Petretta, Mario ;
Ponsiglione, Andrea ;
Fusco, Ferdinando ;
Longo, Nicola ;
Persico, Francesco ;
Cocozza, Sirio ;
Brunetti, Arturo ;
Imbriaco, Massimo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 104 :64-70
[7]   The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction [J].
Distler, Florian A. ;
Radtke, Jan P. ;
Bonekamp, David ;
Kesch, Claudia ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ;
Wieczorek, Kathrin ;
Kirchner, Marietta ;
Pahernik, Sascha ;
Hohenfellner, Markus ;
Hadaschikk, Boris A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (03) :575-582
[8]   Do patients with a PI-RADS 5 lesion identified on magnetic resonance imaging require systematic biopsy in addition to targeted biopsy? [J].
Drobish, Justin N. ;
Bevill, Mark D. ;
Tracy, Chad R. ;
Sexton, Shawn M. ;
Rajput, Maheen ;
Metz, Catherine M. ;
Gellhaus, Paul T. .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (04) :235.e1-235.e4
[9]   Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies [J].
Filson, Christopher P. ;
Natarajan, Shyam ;
Margolis, Daniel J. A. ;
Huang, Jiaoti ;
Lieu, Patricia ;
Dorey, Frederick J. ;
Reiter, Robert E. ;
Marks, Leonard S. .
CANCER, 2016, 122 (06) :884-892
[10]   MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis [J].
Kasivisvanathan, V ;
Rannikko, A. S. ;
Borghi, M. ;
Panebianco, V ;
Mynderse, L. A. ;
Vaarala, M. H. ;
Briganti, A. ;
Budaus, L. ;
Hellawell, G. ;
Hindley, R. G. ;
Roobol, M. J. ;
Eggener, S. ;
Ghei, M. ;
Villers, A. ;
Bladou, F. ;
Villeirs, G. M. ;
Virdi, J. ;
Boxler, S. ;
Robert, G. ;
Singh, P. B. ;
Venderink, W. ;
Hadaschik, B. A. ;
Ruffion, A. ;
Hu, J. C. ;
Margolis, D. ;
Crouzet, S. ;
Klotz, L. ;
Taneja, S. S. ;
Pinto, P. ;
Gill, I ;
Allen, C. ;
Giganti, F. ;
Freeman, A. ;
Morris, S. ;
Punwani, S. ;
Williams, N. R. ;
Brew-Graves, C. ;
Deeks, J. ;
Takwoingi, Y. ;
Emberton, M. ;
Moore, C. M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (19) :1767-1777