Inclusive smart cities? Technology-driven urban development and disabilities

被引:4
作者
Makkonen, Teemu [1 ]
Inkinen, Tommi [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Karelian Inst, Yliopistokatu 2, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
[2] Univ Turku, Dept Geog & Geol, Vesilinnantie 5, FI-20500 Turku, Finland
关键词
Disabilities; Inclusiveness; Smart city; Sustainable development goals; Technology-driven urban development; 2; DECADES; CITY; PEOPLE; INFRASTRUCTURE; INITIATIVES; SHRINKAGE; SCIENCES; TRENDS; PLACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2024.105334
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
The concept of smart cities refers to urban areas that utilize (digital) technologies to enhance urban operations, services, and the quality of life of their residents. However, people have varying possibilities and capabilities for using (digital) technologies. This intertwines the technology-driven urban development with the ideal of inclusiveness (or the lack thereof) as it seems unrealistic to assume that smart cities would benefit equally the whole society. This controversy is approached by questioning whether smart cities can really improve the living conditions of the disadvantaged via reviewing the literature that ties technology-driven urban development to persons with disabilities. The study shows, first, that disabilities are rarely discussed in the extant literature on smart cities particularly from a critical perspective. Second, it is underlined here, based on the reviewed literature, that while smart city initiatives hold promise for enhancing urban living conditions of persons with disabilities, they are not one-size-fits-all answers to tackle the marginalization of persons with disabilities. Rather, since technological solutions do not counter the fundamental barriers of exclusion, urban technologies still need advanced ideas in establishing a truly inclusive smart city.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [21] Digital cities of the future: Extending @home assistive technologies for the elderly and the disabled
    Doukas, Charalampos
    Metsis, Vangelis
    Becker, Eric
    Le, Zhengyi
    Makedon, Fillia
    Maglogiannis, Ilias
    [J]. TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2011, 28 (03) : 176 - 190
  • [22] Participative urban renewal? Disability, community, and partnership in New Labour's urban policy
    Edwards, Claire
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2008, 40 (07): : 1664 - 1680
  • [23] European Commissio, 2023, Smart cities
  • [24] Mapping ethical issues in the use of smart home health technologies to care for older persons: a systematic review
    Felber, Nadine Andrea
    Tian, Yi Jiao
    Pageau, Felix
    Elger, Bernice Simone
    Wangmo, Tenzin
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [25] From smart specialisation to smart specialisation policy
    Foray, Dominique
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 17 (04) : 492 - +
  • [26] Towards Human Smart Cities: Internet of Things for sensory impaired individuals
    Garcia Ramirez, Alejandro R.
    Gonzalez-Carrasco, Israel
    Jasper, Gustavo Henrique
    Lopez, Amarilys Lima
    Luis Lopez-Cuadrado, Jose
    Garcia-Crespo, Angel
    [J]. COMPUTING, 2017, 99 (01) : 107 - 126
  • [27] Smart Tools for Socially Sustainable Transport: A Review of Mobility Apps
    Gebresselassie, Mahtot
    Sanchez, Thomas W.
    [J]. URBAN SCIENCE, 2018, 2 (02)
  • [28] What makes a smart village smart? A review of the literature
    Gerli, Paolo
    Navio Marco, Julio
    Whalley, Jason
    [J]. TRANSFORMING GOVERNMENT- PEOPLE PROCESS AND POLICY, 2022, 16 (03) : 292 - 304
  • [29] Artificial intelligence and internet of things in screening and management of autism spectrum disorder
    Ghosh, Tapotosh
    Al Banna, Md. Hasan
    Rahman, Md. Sazzadur
    Kaiser, M. Shamim
    Mahmud, Mufti
    Hosen, A. S. M. Sanwar
    Cho, Gi Hwan
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 74
  • [30] Disability and the open city
    Gleeson, B
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 2001, 38 (02) : 251 - 265