Barriers and facilitators to implement the redispensing of unused oral anticancer drugs in clinical care: A hybrid-effectiveness type I study

被引:0
作者
Smale, Elisabeth M. [1 ]
Verkerk, Eva W. [2 ]
Heerdink, Eibert R. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Egberts, Toine C. G. [3 ,4 ]
van den Bemt, Bart J. F. [1 ,6 ]
Bekker, Charlotte L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Clin Pharm, Div Lab Genet & Pharm, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Inst Pharmaceut Sci, Fac Sci, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Clin Pharmacol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Utrecht, Appl Med Ctr Utrecht, Res Grp Innovat Pharmaceut Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Sint Maartensklin, Dept Pharm, Ubbergen, Netherlands
来源
EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
Medication waste; Medication redispensing; Oral anticancer drugs; Stakeholder engagement; Hybrid effectiveness-implementation design; Qualitative research; WASTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100493
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Minimizing medication waste through the redispensing of oral anticancer drugs (OADs) that were unused by patients provides economic and environmental benefits, but this is not yet universally implemented in clinical care. Objective(S): To identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of redispensing unused OADs in clinical care. Methods: A multicentre intervention study following a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type I design was conducted, consisting of semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders involved in the redispensing program: pharmacy employees, prescribing clinicians in oncology and haematology, patients who participated in redispensing and patients who declined trial participation. Questions encompassed experiences and suggestions for future implementation. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided data collection and categorisation of identified barriers and facilitators through thematic analysis. Results: In total, 35 interviews were conducted, identifying 15 themes encompassing barriers and facilitators, reflecting all CFIR domains. Facilitators encompassed: 1) convenient process requiring an acceptable time- investment; 2) support from project leaders and implementation champions; 3) being well-motivated by personal values and societal impact; 4) feeling ensured of medication quality upon redispensing; 5) endorsement by healthcare providers for patient participation; 6) clear and personal patient communication; 7) good visibility of intervention successes; and 8) implementation well supported through a collaborative network. Barriers encompassed: 1) unclear target population; 2) redispensing legally prohibited; 3) absence of financial compensation for pharmacies; 4) complexity arising from two parallel work processes; 5) widespread communication on adjustments within local teams challenging; 6) patient's low receptiveness due to burden of oncology treatment; and 7) lack of familiarization among pharmacy technicians. Conclusions: Facilitators for implementation of redispensing un used drugs mainly related to people's values, motivation, and societal demand, whereas barriers mainly encompassed practical issues, including knowledge, time, financial resources, and legal conditions. Strategies emphasizing the benefits of redispensing and further streamlining process compatibility could support implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] How do people conceptualise the reuse of medicines? An interview study
    Alhamad, Hamza
    Patel, Nilesh
    Donyai, Parastou
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2018, 26 (03) : 232 - 241
  • [2] Can We Create a Circular Pharmaceutical Supply Chain (CPSC) to Reduce Medicines Waste?
    Alshemari, Abdullah
    Breen, Liz
    Quinn, Gemma
    Sivarajah, Uthayasankar
    [J]. PHARMACY, 2020, 8 (04)
  • [3] Mitigating pharmaceutical waste exposures: policy and program considerations
    Amster, Eric D.
    [J]. ISRAEL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH, 2016, 5
  • [4] Nurses' perceptions of climate and environmental issues: a qualitative study
    Anaker, Anna
    Nilsson, Maria
    Holmner, Asa
    Elf, Marie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2015, 71 (08) : 1883 - 1891
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, Green Pharmacy Practice: Taking responsability for the environmental impacto of medicines
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2018, Stemming the Superbug Tide, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264307599-EN
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2021, Trial NL 9208
  • [8] Sustainability in critical care practice: A grounded theory study
    Baid, Heather
    Richardson, Janet
    Scholes, Julie
    Hebron, Clair
    [J]. NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 26 (01) : 20 - 27
  • [9] Bataduwaarachchi V.R., 2016, International Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, V5, P2290, DOI DOI 10.18203/2319-2003.IJBCP20164081
  • [10] What does it cost to redispense unused medications in the pharmacy? A micro-costing study
    Bekker, Charlotte L.
    Gardarsdottir, Helga
    Egberts, Antoine C. G.
    Molenaar, Hendrik A.
    Bouvy, Marcel L.
    van den Bemt, Bart J. F.
    Hovels, Anke M.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (1)