Meta-analytical evidence for frequency-dependent selection across the tree of life

被引:1
作者
Gomez-Llano, Miguel [1 ]
Bassar, Ronald D. [2 ]
Svensson, Erik I. [3 ]
Tye, Simon P. [4 ]
Siepielski, Adam M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Karlstad Univ, Dept Environm & Life Sci, Karlstad, Sweden
[2] Auburn Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Auburn, AL USA
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Biol, Lund, Sweden
[4] Univ Arkansas, Dept Biol Sci, Fayetteville, AR USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
frequency-dependent selection; genetic variation; meta-analysis; PHENOTYPIC SELECTION; DIRECTIONAL SELECTION; GENETIC-POLYMORPHISM; COLOR POLYMORPHISM; TEMPORAL DYNAMICS; NATURAL-SELECTION; STRIPE RUST; RARE MALES; EVOLUTION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1111/ele.14477
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Explaining the maintenance of genetic variation in fitness-related traits within populations is a fundamental challenge in ecology and evolutionary biology. Frequency-dependent selection (FDS) is one mechanism that can maintain such variation, especially when selection favours rare variants (negative FDS). However, our general knowledge about the occurrence of FDS, its strength and direction remain fragmented, limiting general inferences about this important evolutionary process. We systematically reviewed the published literature on FDS and assembled a database of 747 effect sizes from 101 studies to analyse the occurrence, strength, and direction of FDS, and the factors that could explain heterogeneity in FDS. Using a meta-analysis, we found that overall, FDS is more commonly negative, although not significantly when accounting for phylogeny. An analysis of absolute values of effect sizes, however, revealed the widespread occurrence of modest FDS. However, negative FDS was only significant in laboratory experiments and non-significant in mesocosms and field-based studies. Moreover, negative FDS was stronger in studies measuring fecundity and involving resource competition over studies using other fitness components or focused on other ecological interactions. Our study unveils key general patterns of FDS and points in future promising research directions that can help us understand a long-standing fundamental problem in evolutionary biology and its consequences for demography and ecological dynamics. In nature, there is ample evidence of local adaptation among populations, which would predict an erosion of genetic variation due to natural selection. However, numerous studies have documented substantial genetic variation in most traits, more than could be explained by mutation alone. Here, we present a literature review and meta-analysis showing evidence of negative frequency-dependence selection, in agreement with this mechanism maintaiing genetic variation.image
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] Ayala F.J., 1974, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V5, P115, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000555
  • [2] Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it
    Barnett, AG
    van der Pols, JC
    Dobson, AJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (01) : 215 - 220
  • [3] Understanding quantitative genetic variation
    Barton, NH
    Keightley, PD
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2002, 3 (01) : 11 - 21
  • [4] Experimental Evidence for Density-Dependent Regulation and Selection on Trinidadian Guppy Life Histories
    Bassar, Ronald D.
    Lopez-Sepulcre, Andres
    Reznick, David N.
    Travis, Joseph
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2013, 181 (01) : 25 - 38
  • [5] Genetic variance in fitness indicates rapid contemporary adaptive evolution in wild animals
    Bonnet, Timothee
    Morrissey, Michael B.
    de Villemereuil, Pierre
    Alberts, Susan C.
    Arcese, Peter
    Bailey, Liam D.
    Boutin, Stan
    Brekke, Patricia
    Brent, Lauren J. N.
    Camenisch, Glauco
    Charmantier, Anne
    Clutton-Brock, Tim H.
    Cockburn, Andrew
    Coltman, David W.
    Courtiol, Alexandre
    Davidian, Eve
    Evans, Simon R.
    Ewen, John G.
    Festa-Bianchet, Marco
    de Franceschi, Christophe
    Gustafsson, Lars
    Honer, Oliver P.
    Houslay, Thomas M.
    Keller, Lukas F.
    Manser, Marta
    McAdam, Andrew G.
    McLean, Emily
    Nietlisbach, Pirmin
    Osmond, Helen L.
    Pemberton, Josephine M.
    Postma, Erik
    Reid, Jane M.
    Rutschmann, Alexis
    Santure, Anna W.
    Sheldon, Ben C.
    Slate, Jon
    Teplitsky, Celine
    Visser, Marcel E.
    Wachter, Bettina
    Kruuk, Loeske E. B.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2022, 376 (6596) : 1012 - +
  • [6] Borenstein Michael, 2009, Handb. Res. Synth. Meta-Anal., V2, P221, DOI DOI 10.7758/9781610441384
  • [8] Brunet J, 2000, EVOLUTION, V54, P406, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00043.x
  • [9] Bürkner PC, 2018, R J, V10, P395
  • [10] What Are the Environmental Determinants of Phenotypic Selection? A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies
    Caruso, Christina M.
    Martin, Ryan A.
    Sletvold, Nina
    Morrissey, Michael B.
    Wade, Michael J.
    Augustine, Kate E.
    Carlson, Stephanie M.
    MacColl, Andrew D. C.
    Siepielski, Adam M.
    Kingsolver, Joel G.
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2017, 190 (03) : 363 - 376