Estimating the occurrence of broken rails in commuter railroads with machine learning algorithms

被引:0
作者
Kang, Di [1 ]
Dai, Junyan [1 ]
Liu, Xiang [1 ]
Bian, Zheyong [2 ]
Zaman, Asim [1 ]
Wang, Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Univ New Brunswick, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, CoRE 606, 96 Frelinghuysen Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Univ Houston, Dept Supply Chain & Logist Technol, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Broken rails; machine learning; commuter railroad; rail defects;
D O I
10.1177/09544097241280848
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Broken rail prevention is critical for ensuring track infrastructure safety. With the increasing availability of rail data, the opportunity for data-driven analyses emerges as a promising avenue for enhancing railroad safety. While previous research has predominantly concentrated on predicting broken rails within the context of freight railroads, the attention afforded to commuter railroads has been limited. To address this research gap, this paper presents an analytical modeling framework based on machine learning (ML) algorithms (including LightGBM, XGBoost, Random Forests, and Logistic Regression) to investigate the occurrence of broken rails on commuter rail segments. It leverages various features such as gradient, curvature, annual traffic, operational speed, and the history of prior rail defects. We use oversampling techniques, including ADASYN, random oversampling, and SMOTE, to address the issue of imbalanced data. This challenge arises due to the majority of commuter rail segments not experiencing any broken rails during the study period, resulting in a small sample size of broken rail instances. The findings indicate that, for the dataset employed in this study, LightGBM, in conjunction with random oversampling, exhibits superior performance. Based on the feature importance results, the critical factors influencing the prediction of broken rail occurrences on this commuter railroad are gradient, operational speed, and prior rail defects.
引用
收藏
页码:1338 / 1350
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Commuter Rail Electrifications That Never Were and What They Teach Us
    Allen, John G.
    Newmark, Gregory L.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2022, : 639 - 652
  • [2] Reasons for Commuter Rail Electrification: Early 20th Century and Since 2000
    Allen, John G.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2019, 2673 (07) : 227 - 238
  • [3] Imperfect rail-track inspection scheduling with zero-inflated miss rates
    Altay, Ayca
    Baykal-Gursoy, Melike
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 138
  • [4] Andrews JRC., 2022, THESIS TEMPLE U PHIL
  • [5] SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique
    Chawla, Nitesh V.
    Bowyer, Kevin W.
    Hall, Lawrence O.
    Kegelmeyer, W. Philip
    [J]. 2002, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (16)
  • [6] Vibration-based damage detection of rail fastener using fully convolutional networks
    Chen, Mei
    Zhai, Wanming
    Zhu, Shengyang
    Xu, Lei
    Sun, Yu
    [J]. VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2022, 60 (07) : 2191 - 2210
  • [7] Machine learning based prediction of rail transit signal failure: A case study in the United States
    Dai, Junyan
    Liu, Xiang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART F-JOURNAL OF RAIL AND RAPID TRANSIT, 2023, 237 (05) : 680 - 689
  • [8] Multivariate statistical model for predicting occurrence and location of broken rails
    Dick, CT
    Barkan, CPL
    Chapman, ER
    Stehly, MP
    [J]. RAILROAD RESEARCH: INTERCITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION, TRACK DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE, AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORT: RAIL, 2003, (1825): : 48 - 55
  • [9] Ekberg A., 2014, SURFACE FATIGUE INIT
  • [10] Forecasting Risk of Service Failures Between Successive Rail Inspections: A Data-Driven Approach
    Faeze Ghofrani
    Naresh Kumar Chava
    Qing He
    [J]. Journal of Big Data Analytics in Transportation, 2020, 2 (1): : 17 - 31