Common Law, Equity and Statute: A Complex Entangled System

被引:0
作者
Stevens, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, English Private Law, Oxford, England
来源
SYDNEY LAW REVIEW | 2023年 / 45卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Using Judge of Appeal Mark Leeming's fascinating work on sources of law as a springboard, this review essay makes three sweeping claims about the different sources of law in Australia that that work analyses. First, that judge -made law without statutory foundation, our law in common, has a different nature that may justify its continuing existence in uncodified form. Second, that equitable rules have a different formal structure that explains why they often differ from those at common law. Third, that although a common law of Australia is possible, it is still too soon to say whether that has been achieved.
引用
收藏
页数:124
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1952, Attorney -General (NSW) v Perpetual Trustee
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Bunnings Group Ltd v CHEP Australia Ltd
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Banque Financiere de la Cite v Parc (Battersea) Ltd
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus plc
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Clark v Macourt
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Ancient Order of Foresters in Victoria Friendly Society Ltd v Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Ltd
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Jaken Properties Australia Pty Ltd v Naaman
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon