Definitions, terminology and standards for reporting of births and deaths in the perinatal period: International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11)

被引:9
作者
Blencowe, Hannah [1 ]
Hug, Lucia [2 ]
Moller, Ann-Beth [3 ]
You, Danzhen [2 ]
Moran, Allisyn C. [4 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Maternal Adolescent Reprod & Child Hlth MARCH Ctr, London, England
[2] UNICEF, Div Data Analyt Planning & Monitoring, New York, NY USA
[3] WHO, UNDP UNFPA UNICEF WHO World Bank Special Program, Dept Sexual & Reprod Hlth & Res, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] WHO, Dept Maternal Newborn Child & Adolescent Hlth & A, Geneva, Switzerland
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
fetal death; ICD-11; mortality statistics; neonatal death; perinatal; stillbirth; STILLBIRTHS;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.15794
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Despite efforts to reduce stillbirths and neonatal deaths, inconsistent definitions and reporting practices continue to hamper global progress. Existing data frequently being limited in terms of quality and comparability across countries. This paper addresses this critical issue by outlining the new International Classification of Disease (ICD-11) recommendations for standardized recording and reporting of perinatal deaths to improve data accuracy and international comparison. Key advancements in ICD-11 include using gestational age as the primary threshold to for reporting, clearer guidance on measurement and recording of gestational age, and reporting mortality rates by gestational age subgroups to enable country comparisons to include similar populations (e.g., all births from 154 days [22(+0) weeks] or from 196 days [28(+0) weeks]). Furthermore, the revised ICD-11 guidance provides further clarification around the exclusion of terminations of pregnancy (induced abortions) from perinatal mortality statistics. Implementing standardized recording and reporting methods laid out in ICD-11 will be crucial for accurate global data on stillbirths and perinatal deaths. Such high-quality data would both allow appropriate regional and international comparisons to be made and serve as a resource to improve clinical practice and epidemiological and health surveillance, enabling focusing of limited programmatic and research funds towards ending preventable deaths and improving outcomes for every woman and every baby, everywhere.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1949, International statistical classification of diseases, injuries and causes of death. 6th revision
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths
[3]   Stillbirth outcome capture and classification in population-based surveys: EN-INDEPTH study [J].
Blencowe, Hannah ;
Bottecchia, Matteo ;
Kwesiga, Doris ;
Akuze, Joseph ;
Haider, M. Moinuddin ;
Galiwango, Edward ;
Dzabeng, Francis ;
Fisker, Ane B. ;
Enuameh, Yeetey Akpe Kwesi ;
Geremew, Bisrat Misganaw ;
Nareeba, Tryphena ;
Woodd, Susannah ;
Beedle, Alexandra ;
Peven, Kimberly ;
Cousens, Simon ;
Waiswa, Peter ;
Lawn, Joy E. .
POPULATION HEALTH METRICS, 2021, 19 (Suppl 1)
[4]   Facility-based stillbirth review processes used in different countries across the world: a systematic review [J].
Boo, Yebeen Ysabelle ;
Gwacham-Anisiobi, Uchenna ;
Thakrar, Dixa B. ;
Roberts, Nia ;
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J. ;
Lakhanpaul, Monica ;
Nair, Manisha .
ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2023, 59
[5]   Differences in perinatal and infant mortality in high-income countries: artifacts of birth registration or evidence of true differences? [J].
Deb-Rinker, Paromita ;
Leon, Juan Andres ;
Gilbert, Nicolas L. ;
Rouleau, Jocelyn ;
Andersen, Anne-Marie Nybo ;
Bjarnadottir, Ragnheiour I. ;
Gissler, Mika ;
Mortensen, Laust H. ;
Skjaerven, Rolv ;
Vollset, Stein Emil ;
Zhang, Xun ;
Shah, Prakesh S. ;
Sauve, Reg S. ;
Kramer, Michael S. ;
Joseph, K. S. .
BMC PEDIATRICS, 2015, 15
[6]   Risk of recurrent stillbirth and neonatal mortality: mother-specific random effects analysis using longitudinal panel data from Indonesia (2000-2014) [J].
Dev, Alka .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2022, 22 (01)
[7]   Clarity and consistency in stillbirth reporting in Europe: why is it so hard to get this right? [J].
Gissler, Mika ;
Durox, Melanie ;
Smith, Lucy ;
Blondel, Beatrice ;
Broeders, Lisa ;
Hindori-Mohangoo, Ashna ;
Kearns, Karen ;
Kolarova, Rumyana ;
Loghi, Marzia ;
Rodin, Urelija ;
Szamotulska, Katarzyna ;
Velebil, Petr ;
Weber, Guy ;
Zurriaga, Oscar ;
Zeitlin, Jennifer .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 32 (02) :200-206
[8]   Assessment of "fresh" versus "macerated" as accurate markers of time since intrauterine fetal demise in low-income countries [J].
Gold, Katherine J. ;
Abdul-Mumin, Abdul-Razak S. ;
Boggs, Martha E. ;
Opare-Addo, Henry S. ;
Lieberman, Richard W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 125 (03) :223-227
[9]   Artificial intelligence and fetal ultrasound biometry: Challenges and perspectives [J].
Grandjean, Gaelle Ambroise ;
Oster, Julien ;
Dap, Matthieu ;
Morel, Olivier ;
Hossu, Gabriela .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2023, 104 (04) :200-201
[10]   Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences [J].
Heazell, Alexander E. P. ;
Siassakos, Dimitrios ;
Blencowe, Hannah ;
Burden, Christy ;
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A. ;
Cacciatore, Joanne ;
Dang, Nghia ;
Das, Jai ;
Flenady, Vicki ;
Gold, Katherine J. ;
Mensah, Olivia K. ;
Millum, Joseph ;
Nuzum, Daniel ;
O'Donoghue, Keelin ;
Redshaw, Maggie ;
Rizvi, Arjumand ;
Roberts, Tracy ;
Saraki, H. E. Toyin ;
Storey, Claire ;
Wojcieszek, Aleena M. ;
Downe, Soo .
LANCET, 2016, 387 (10018) :604-616