Review of linear and circular approaches to on-site domestic wastewater treatment: Analysis of research achievements, trends and distance to target

被引:1
作者
Ribarova, Irina [1 ]
Vasilaki, Vasileia [2 ]
Katsou, Evina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Architecture Civil Engn & Geodezy, Ctr Competence Clean & Circle, 1 Chr Smirnensku Blvd, Sofia 1046, Bulgaria
[2] Imperial Coll London, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Skempton Bldg,South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
Circular economy; Decentralised wastewater treatment; Environmental impact; Hazardous pollutants; Life cycle assessment; Sustainability; FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLAND; MICROBIAL FUEL-CELL; SEPTIC-TANK; SEWAGE-TREATMENT; MASS-BALANCE; ANAEROBIC TREATMENT; TREATMENT SYSTEMS; NUTRIENT REMOVAL; EMERGING CONCERN; NITRATE LOAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121951
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This comprehensive review critically assesses traditional and emerging technologies for domestic wastewater treatment and reuse, focusing on the transition from conventional centralised systems to innovative decentralised approaches. Through an extensive literature search on domestic wastewater systems serving a population equivalent of less than or equal to 10, the study juxtaposes linear and circular methods and highlights their impact on urban water management and the environment. The papers reviewed were classified into five categories: Environmental studies, economic studies, social studies, technological studies, and reviews and policy papers. The analysis was carried out separately for linear and circular approaches within each category. In addition, the maturity of the technology (lab/pilot or full-scale application) was taken into account in the analysis. The research landscape is shown to be evolving towards circular methods that promise sustainability through resource recovery, despite the dominance of linear perspectives. The lack of clear progress in decentralised technologies, the scarcity of circularity assessments and the challenges of urban integration are highlighted. Operational reliability, regulatory compliance and policy support are identified as key barriers to the adoption of decentralised systems. While conventional pollutants and their environmental impacts are well addressed for linear systems, the study of emerging pollutants is in its infancy. Conclusions on the impact of these hazardous pollutants are tentative and cautious. Social and economic studies are mainly based on virtual scenarios, which are useful research tools for achieving sustainability goals. The conceptual frameworks for assessing the social dimension need further refinement to be effective. The paper argues for a balanced integration of centralisation and decentralisation, proposing a dual strategy that emphasizes the development of interoperable technologies. It calls for further research, policy development and widespread implementation to promote decentralised solutions in urban water management and pave the way for sustainable urban ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 172 条
  • [31] Suitability of fluorescent whitening compounds (FWCs) as indicators of human faecal contamination from septic tanks in rural catchments
    Dubber, Donata
    Gill, Laurence W.
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2017, 127 : 104 - 117
  • [32] The effect of aeration on treatment efficiency and bioenergy generation of septic-tank effluent in constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell
    Ebrahimi, Atieh
    Sivakumar, Muttucumaru
    McLauchlan, Craig
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2023, 52
  • [33] To connect or not to connect? Modelling the optimal degree of centralisation for wastewater infrastructures
    Eggimann, Sven
    Truffer, Bernhard
    Maurer, Max
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2015, 84 : 218 - 231
  • [34] EPA, 2021, Population Equivalent, V10
  • [35] How decentralized treatment can contribute to the symbiosis between environmental protection and resource recovery
    Estevez, Sofia
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara
    Feijoo, Gumersindo
    Teresa Moreira, Maria
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 812
  • [36] EU, 1991, Off. J, P40
  • [37] An integrated assessment of environmental, economic, social and technological parameters of source separated and conventional sanitation concepts: A contribution to sustainability analysis
    Firmansyah, I
    Carsjens, G. J.
    de Ruijter, F. J.
    Zeeman, G.
    Spiller, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 295
  • [38] Modelling faecal pathogen flows and health risks in urban Bangladesh: Implications for sanitation decision making
    Foster, Tim
    Falletta, Jay
    Amin, Nuhu
    Rahman, Mahbubur
    Liu, Pengbo
    Raj, Suraja
    Mills, Freya
    Petterson, Susan
    Norman, Guy
    Moe, Christine
    Willetts, Juliet
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYGIENE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 233
  • [39] Comparative analysis of effluent water quality from a municipal treatment plant and two on-site wastewater treatment systems
    Garcia, Santos N.
    Clubbs, Rebekah L.
    Stanley, Jacob K.
    Scheffe, Brian
    Yelderman, Joe C., Jr.
    Brooks, Bryan W.
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2013, 92 (01) : 38 - 44
  • [40] Electro-Fenton systems for "on-site" sanitary wastewater treatment: Towards an off-grid technology for developing countries
    Garcia-Espinoza, Josue Daniel
    Robles, Irma
    Rodriguez-Valadez, Francisco J.
    Rodriguez-Garcia, Adrian
    Ramirez, Jose A.
    Hernandez-Iturriaga, Montserrat
    Godinez, Luis A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (03):