Understanding disciplinary perspectives: a framework to develop skills for interdisciplinary research collaborations of medical experts and engineers

被引:2
作者
van Baalen, Sophie [1 ,2 ]
Boon, Mieke [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Dept Philosophy, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Rathenau Inst, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
Adaptive expertise; Interdisciplinary expertise; Metacognitive skills; Higher-order cognitive abilities; Epistemology; Problem-solving; Reflection; Disciplinary perspectives; Medical technology; INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE; STRATEGIES; BARRIERS; STUDENTS; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-024-05913-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundHealth professionals need to be prepared for interdisciplinary research collaborations aimed at the development and implementation of medical technology. Expertise is highly domain-specific, and learned by being immersed in professional practice. Therefore, the approaches and results from one domain are not easily understood by experts from another domain. Interdisciplinary collaboration in medical research faces not only institutional, but also cognitive and epistemological barriers. This is one of the reasons why interdisciplinary and interprofessional research collaborations are so difficult. To explain the cognitive and epistemological barriers, we introduce the concept of disciplinary perspectives. Making explicit the disciplinary perspectives of experts participating in interdisciplinary collaborations helps to clarify the specific approach of each expert, thereby improving mutual understanding.MethodWe developed a framework for making disciplinary perspectives of experts participating in an interdisciplinary research collaboration explicit. The applicability of the framework has been tested in an interdisciplinary medical research project aimed at the development and implementation of diffusion MRI for the diagnosis of kidney cancer, where the framework was applied to analyse and articulate the disciplinary perspectives of the experts involved.ResultsWe propose a general framework, in the form of a series of questions, based on new insights from the philosophy of science into the epistemology of interdisciplinary research. We explain these philosophical underpinnings in order to clarify the cognitive and epistemological barriers of interdisciplinary research collaborations. In addition, we present a detailed example of the use of the framework in a concrete interdisciplinary research project aimed at developing a diagnostic technology. This case study demonstrates the applicability of the framework in interdisciplinary research projects.ConclusionInterdisciplinary research collaborations can be facilitated by a better understanding of how an expert's disciplinary perspectives enables and guides their specific approach to a problem. Implicit disciplinary perspectives can and should be made explicit in a systematic manner, for which we propose a framework that can be used by disciplinary experts participating in interdisciplinary research project. Furthermore, we suggest that educators can explore how the framework and philosophical underpinning can be implemented in HPE to support the development of students' interdisciplinary expertise.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature
    Aboelela, Sally W.
    Larson, Elaine
    Bakken, Suzanne
    Carrasquillo, Olveen
    Formicola, Allan
    Glied, Sherry A.
    Haas, Janet
    Gebbie, Kristine M.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 42 (01) : 329 - 346
  • [2] Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: A literature review
    Abu-Rish, Erin
    Kim, Sara
    Choe, Lapio
    Varpio, Lara
    Malik, Elisabeth
    White, Andrew A.
    Craddick, Karen
    Blondon, Katherine
    Robins, Lynne
    Nagasawa, Pamela
    Thigpen, Allison
    Chen, Lee-Ling
    Rich, Joanne
    Zierler, Brenda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2012, 26 (06) : 444 - 451
  • [3] Acquavita Shauna P, 2014, J Allied Health, V43, pe31
  • [4] Collaboration, interdisciplinarity, and the epistemology of contemporary science
    Andersen, Hanne
    [J]. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2016, 56 : 1 - 10
  • [5] The Second Essential Tension: on Tradition and Innovation in Interdisciplinary Research
    Andersen, Hanne
    [J]. TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY, 2013, 32 (01): : 3 - 8
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2010, Medical Devices: Managing the Mismatch
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2001, Issues in integrated Studies
  • [8] Concepts of interdisciplinarity: Configurations of knowledge and action
    Aram, JD
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 2004, 57 (04) : 379 - 412
  • [9] Bammer G, 2013, DISCIPLINING INTERDISCIPLINARITY: INTEGRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCES FOR RESEARCHING COMPLEX REAL-WORLD PROBLEMS, P1
  • [10] Boon M, 2023, SEFI2023, DOI [10.21427/ZDX4-VV41, DOI 10.21427/ZDX4-VV41]