Prediction models for acute kidney injury following liver transplantation: A systematic review and critical appraisal

被引:1
作者
Huang, Jingying [1 ]
Chen, Jiaojiao [4 ]
Yang, Jin [2 ]
Han, Mengbo [2 ]
Xue, Zihao [3 ]
Wang, Yina [3 ]
Xu, Miaomiao [4 ]
Qi, Haiou [2 ]
Wang, Yuting [5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Sch Med, Operating Room, Hangzhou 310016, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Nursing Dept, Hangzhou 310016, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Postanesthesia Care Unit, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Sch Med, Orthopaed Dept, Hangzhou 310016, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Anaesthesiol, Hangzhou 310016, Peoples R China
关键词
Acute kidney injury; Liver transplantation; Prediction model; Systematic review; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SURVIVAL; DEFINITION; IMPACT; SCORE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103808
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to systematically review and critical evaluation of the risk of bias and the applicability of existing prediction models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation. Data source: A comprehensive literature search up until February 7, 2024, was conducted across nine databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, and VIP. Study design: Systematic review of observational studies. Extraction methods: Literature screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two researchers using a standardized checklist designed for the critical appraisal of prediction modelling studies in systematic reviews. The prediction model risk of bias assessment tool was utilized to assess both the risk of bias and the models' applicability. Principal findings: Thirty studies were included, identifying 34 prediction models. External validation was conducted in seven studies, while internal validation exclusively took place in eight studies. Three models were subjected to both internal and external validation, the area under the curve ranging from 0.610 to 0.921. A metaanalysis of high-frequency predictors identified several statistically significant factors, including recipient body mass index, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, preoperative albumin levels, international normalized ratio, and surgical-related factors such as cold ischemia time. All studies were demonstrated a high risk of bias, mainly due to the use of unsuitable data sources and inadequate detail in the analysis reporting. Conclusions: The evaluation with prediction model risk of bias assessment tool indicated a considerable bias risk in current predictive models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation. Implications for Clinical Practice: The recognition of high bias in existing models calls for future research to employ rigorous methodologies and robust data sources, aiming to develop and validate more accurate and clinically applicable predictive models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Acute Kidney Injury After Liver Transplant: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Impact on Patient Outcomes
    Arani, Reyhane Hizomi
    Abbasi, Mohammad Reza
    Mansournia, Mohammad Ali
    Toosi, Mohssen Nassiri
    Jafarian, Ali
    Moosaie, Fatemeh
    Karimi, Elaheh
    Moazzeni, Seyyed Saeed
    Abbasi, Zahra
    Shojamoradi, Mohammad Hossein
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 19 (12) : 1277 - 1285
  • [2] A prediction score model and survival analysis of acute kidney injury following orthotopic liver transplantation in adults
    Bao, Banghe
    Wang, Wenjing
    Wang, Yumei
    Chen, Qing
    [J]. ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (06) : 6168 - 6179
  • [3] Acute Kidney Injury Following Liver Transplantation: Definition and Outcome
    Barri, Yousri M.
    Sanchez, Edmund Q.
    Jennings, Linda W.
    Melton, Larry B.
    Hays, Steven
    Levy, Marlon F.
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 15 (05) : 475 - 483
  • [4] Features Importance in Acute Kidney Injury After Liver Transplant: Which Predictors Are Relevant?
    Beghdadi, Nassiba
    Kitano, Yuki
    Golse, Nicolas
    Vibert, Eric
    Cunha, Antonio Sa
    Azoulay, Daniel
    Cherqui, Daniel
    Adam, Rene
    Allard, Marc-Antoine
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 21 (05) : 408 - 414
  • [5] Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group
    Bellomo, R
    Ronco, C
    Kellum, JA
    Mehta, RL
    Palevsky, P
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 8 (04): : R204 - R212
  • [6] Intraoperative risk factors of acute kidney injury after liver transplantation
    Berkowitz, Rachel J.
    Engoren, Milo C.
    Mentz, Graciela
    Sharma, Pratima
    Kumar, Sathish S.
    Davis, Ryan
    Kheterpal, Sachin
    Sonnenday, Christopher J.
    Douville, Nicholas J.
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 28 (07) : 1207 - 1223
  • [7] Risk factors and prediction of acute kidney injury after liver transplantation: Logistic regression and artificial neural network approaches
    Bredt, Luis Cesar
    Batista Peres, Luis Alberto
    Risso, Michel
    de Albuquerque Leite Barros, Leandro Cavalcanti
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 14 (03) : 570 - 582
  • [8] Acute kidney injury following liver transplantation: a systematic review of published predictive models
    Caragata, R.
    Wyssusek, K. H.
    Kruger, R.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2016, 44 (02) : 251 - 261
  • [9] Chen X., 2021, A New Predictive Model for Early Acute Kidney Injury After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation and Its Perioperative High-Risk Factors, DOI [10.27202/d.cnki.gkmyc.2021.000670, DOI 10.27202/D.CNKI.GKMYC.2021.000670]
  • [10] Prognostic Value of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Incorporating with Serum Sodium Score for Development of Acute Kidney Injury after Liver Transplantation
    Cheng, Yuan
    Wei, Guo-Qing
    Cai, Qiu-Cheng
    Jiang, Yi
    Wu, Ai-Ping
    [J]. CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 131 (11) : 1314 - 1320