Effect of thoracic manipulation on neck pain in the mobility group: A randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Yoshida, Ryota [1 ,2 ]
Ichikawa, Kazuna [1 ]
Nagahori, Hiraku [3 ]
Tazawa, Tomohiro [4 ]
Kuruma, Hironobu [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Metropolitan Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, 7-2-10 Higashiogu,Arakawa Ku, Tokyo 1168551, Japan
[2] Yomiuri Clin, 1-7-1 Otemachi,Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Seijo Surg Orthoped Clini, 2-35-18 Seijo,Setagaya Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Sonodakai Joint replacement Ctr Hosp, 1-21-10 Hokuima,Adachi Ku, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
mobility; neck pain; neck rotation; range of motion; thoracic spine manipulation; treatment-based classification; SPINE MANIPULATION; REGIONAL INTERDEPENDENCE; CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM; PHYSICAL-THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; RELIABILITY; DISABILITY; MOTION; MECHANISMS; IMMEDIATE;
D O I
10.1002/hsr2.70031
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background and aims: Thoracic spine manipulation (TSM) increases the thoracic spine's range of motion (ROM), effectively reducing pain intensity and disability in patients with mechanical neck pain. We aimed to determine the effect of TSM on neck pain intensity and functional impairment in patients classified under the "mobility" category in Childs' classification. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients with mechanical neck pain who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to either the TSM (n = 21) or sham manipulation (n = 20) group. The primary outcomes were pain during neck rotation and subjective improvement assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Global Rating of Change (GROC), respectively. The secondary outcomes were NPRS at rest, disability (assessed using the Neck Disability Index [NDI]), and ROM of the cervical and thoracic spine rotation. Outcome measurements were performed at baseline, immediately after treatment, 1 week after treatment, and at the 4-week follow-up. Linear mixed models were used to analyze the NPRS, NDI, and ROM. The GROC was analyzed using a chi-square test for the percentage recording >=+4; the means of each group were compared using an unpaired t-test. Results: The NPRS with neck rotation, neck and thoracic ROM, and NDI showed significant interactions between the groups. The NPRS with neck rotation was significantly lower in the TSM group than in the sham group at all time points after the treatment (p < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups in the proportion showing moderate (>=+4) improvement according to the GROC; however, there was a significant difference in the mean values (p = 0.013). Conclusion: Incorporating TSM into treatment protocols may improve clinical outcomes in patients with neck pain, potentially leading to better pain management and functional recovery. Therefore, physiotherapists should consider TSM as a viable and effective intervention to improve patient outcomes in neck pain rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effectiveness of thoracic manipulation on patients with chronic mechanical neck pain - A randomized controlled trial
    Lau, Herman Mun Cheung
    Chiu, Thomas Tai Wing
    Lam, Tai-Hing
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2011, 16 (02) : 141 - 147
  • [2] Effect of thoracic manipulation and deep craniocervical flexor training on pain, mobility, strength, and disability of the neck of patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain: a randomized clinical trial
    Lee, Kwan-Woo
    Kim, Won-Ho
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2016, 28 (01) : 175 - 180
  • [3] The Effects of Thoracic Manipulation Versus Mobilization for Chronic Neck Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial Pilot Study
    Suvarnnato, Thavatchai
    Puntumetakul, Rungthip
    Kaber, David
    Boucaut, Rose
    Boonphakob, Yodchai
    Arayawichanon, Preeda
    Chatchawan, Uraiwan
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2013, 25 (07) : 865 - 871
  • [4] Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial
    Cleland, JA
    Childs, MJD
    McRae, M
    Palmer, JA
    Stowell, T
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2005, 10 (02) : 127 - 135
  • [6] Thoracic Spine Manipulation for the Management of Patients With Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Gonzalez-Iglesias, Javier
    Fernandez-de-las-Penas, Cesar
    Cleland, Joshua A.
    del Rosario Gutierrez-Vega, Maria
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2009, 39 (01): : 20 - 27
  • [7] Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation on cervical joint position sense in individuals with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial
    Erdem, Emin Ulas
    Unver, Banu
    Akbas, Eda
    Kinikli, Gizem Irem
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 34 (05) : 735 - 743
  • [8] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Manipulation With Mobilization for Recent Onset Neck Pain
    Leaver, Andrew M.
    Maher, Christopher G.
    Herbert, Robert D.
    Latimer, Jane
    McAuley, James H.
    Jull, Gwendolen
    Refshauge, Kathryn M.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 91 (09): : 1313 - 1318
  • [9] MANUAL AND INSTRUMENT APPLIED CERVICAL MANIPULATION FOR MECHANICAL NECK PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Gorrell, Lindsay M.
    Beath, Kenneth
    Engel, Roger M.
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 39 (05) : 319 - 329
  • [10] Effect of cervical vs. thoracic spinal manipulation on peripheral neural features and grip strength in subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial
    Bautista-Aguirre, Francisco
    Oliva-Pascual-Vaca, Angel
    Heredia-Rizo, Alberto M.
    Bosca-Gandia, Juan J.
    Ricard, Francois
    Rodriguez-Blanco, Cleofas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (03) : 333 - 341