The Anthropocene Is More Than a Time Interval

被引:3
作者
Edgeworth, Matthew [1 ]
Bauer, Andrew M. [2 ]
Ellis, Erle C. [3 ]
Finney, Stanley C. [4 ]
Gill, Jacqueline L. [5 ,6 ]
Gibbard, Philip L. [7 ]
Maslin, Mark [8 ,9 ]
Merritts, Dorothy J. [10 ]
Walker, Michael J. C. [11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Sch Archaeol & Ancient Hist, Leicester, England
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Anthropol, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog & Environm Syst, Baltimore Cty UMBC, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Calif State Univ Long Beach, Dept Geol Sci, Long Beach, CA USA
[5] Univ Maine, Climate Change Inst, Orono, ME USA
[6] Univ Maine, Sch Biol & Ecol, Orono, ME USA
[7] Univ Cambridge, Scott Polar Res Inst, Cambridge, England
[8] UCL, Dept Geog, London, England
[9] Univ Copenhagen, Nat Hist Museum Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
[10] Franklin & Marshall Coll, Dept Earth & Environm, Lancaster, PA USA
[11] Aberystwyth Univ, Dept Geog & Earth Sci, Aberystwyth, Wales
[12] Univ Wales Trinity St David, Fac Humanities & Performing Arts, Lampeter, Wales
关键词
Anthropocene; event;
D O I
10.1029/2024EF004831
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Following the recent rejection of a formal Anthropocene series/epoch by the Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy (SQS) of the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS), and its subsequent confirmation by the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS), the opportunity arises to reset the definition of the Anthropocene. The case for informally recognizing the Anthropocene to be a major planetary event of Earth system transformation offers a promising way forward, but this has been criticized by proponents of an Anthropocene series/epoch. In order to move on from the assumption that it must be a time interval, and to foster a more transdisciplinary and inclusive approach, the main points of the critique must be directly addressed.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Bauer A. M., 2014, Encyclopaedia of the history of science, technology, and medicine in nonwestern cultures, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-3934-58843-2, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-3934-58843-2]
[2]   Anthropocene: event or epoch? [J].
Bauer, Andrew M. .
NATURE, 2021, 597 (7876) :332-332
[3]   The Anthropocene Divide Obscuring Understanding of Social-Environmental Change [J].
Bauer, Andrew M. ;
Ellis, Erle C. .
CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 2018, 59 (02) :209-227
[4]  
Bloch Marc., 1953, The Historian's Craft: Reflections on the Nature and Uses of History and the Techniques and Methods of Those Who Write It
[5]   New opportunities emerge as the Anthropocene epoch vote falls short [J].
Boivin, Nicole ;
Braje, Todd ;
Rick, Torben .
NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2024, 8 (05) :844-845
[6]  
Crutzen P. J., 2000, IGBP Newsl, V41, P17
[7]   Geology of mankind [J].
Crutzen, PJ .
NATURE, 2002, 415 (6867) :23-23
[8]   The stratigraphic basis of the Anthropocene Event [J].
Edgeworth, Matthew ;
Gibbard, Philip ;
Walker, Michael ;
Merritts, Dorothy ;
Finney, Stanley ;
Maslin, Mark .
QUATERNARY SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2023, 11
[9]   The Anthropocene serves science better as an event, rather than an epoch [J].
Edwards, Lucy E. ;
Bauer, Andrew ;
Edgeworth, Matthew ;
Ellis, Erle ;
Finney, Stanley ;
Gibbard, Philip ;
Gill, Jacquelyn L. ;
Maslin, Mark ;
Merritts, Dorothy ;
Ruddiman, William ;
Walker, Michael .
JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE, 2022, 37 (07) :1188-1188
[10]  
Ellis E. C., 2024, New Scientist, V3476