Can the digital economy development limit the size of the informal economy? A nonlinear analysis based on China's provincial panel data

被引:4
作者
Lv, Jiamin [1 ]
Li, Shi [2 ]
Zhu, Mengying [3 ]
Huang, Wenli [4 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou City Univ, Inst Digital Finance, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Carleton Univ, Sprott Sch Business, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Software Technol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, China Acad Financial Res, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Informal economy; Digital economy; Digital finance; MIMIC; Nonlinear analysis; SHADOW ECONOMY; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; HIDDEN ECONOMY; TAX EVASION; DETERMINANTS; INDICATORS; IMPACTS; DEMAND; MOBILE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2024.07.022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates whether and how digital economy (especially digital platforms and digital finance) restrains the informal economic activities in China measured by the MIMIC (multiple indicators multiple causes) model. Using Chinese provincial panel data from 1995 to 2020, we find that the average size of China's provincial informal economy displays a five-stage fluctuation, ranging from 13.63 % to 17.53 %. More importantly, we uncover a robust "inverted Ushaped" nonlinear relationship between the digital platform development and the informal economy, with a turning point of 0.4189. Initially, the development of digital platforms increases informal economic activities by disrupting traditional sectors, causing new types of tax evasion, challenging regulators and raising digital crime. However, beyond a certain threshold, digital platforms can overcome these problems through more job creations and improved regulation. Meanwhile, the digital financial development is proved to have a negative impact on the informal economy because it can offer much more advantages in addressing informality such as making payments transparent, easing credit constraints, raising total income, helping governments reach people and businesses. Our study provides convincing evidence and valuable advice for policymakers when developing digital economy to curb the informal economy.
引用
收藏
页码:896 / 921
页数:26
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   The non-observed economy and economic growth: A meta-analysis [J].
Afonso, Oscar ;
Neves, Pedro Cunha ;
Pinto, Tiago .
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 2020, 44 (01)
[2]   The research on non-linear relationship between enterprise digital transformation and stock price crash risk [J].
Ai, Yongfang ;
Chi, Zheng ;
Sun, Guanglin ;
Zhou, Han ;
Kong, Tao .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2023, 68
[3]   Size matters: entrepreneurial entry and government [J].
Aidis, Ruta ;
Estrin, Saul ;
Mickiewicz, Tomasz Marek .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2012, 39 (01) :119-139
[4]  
Ajide F. M., 2022, International Social Science Journal, V72, P749, DOI [10.1111/issj.12337, DOI 10.1111/ISSJ.12337]
[5]   Globalization and shadow economy: a panel analysis for Africa [J].
Ajide, Folorunsho M. ;
Dada, James T. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 9 (02) :166-189
[6]   Estimating the size of the shadow economy in Spain:: a structural model with latent variables [J].
Alañón, A ;
Gómez-Antonio, M .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2005, 37 (09) :1011-1025
[7]   Tax Evasion and Inequality [J].
Alstadsaeter, Annette ;
Johannesen, Niels ;
Zucman, Gabriel .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 109 (06) :2073-2103
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, G20 High Level Principles for Digital Financial Inclusion
[9]  
APEC, 2022, Stepping Outside the Shadows: Informality and Digitalisation.
[10]  
Awasthi R., 2018, Taxation and the shadow economy: how the tax system can stimulate and enforce the formalization of business activities, DOI https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8391