共 50 条
Diagnostic accuracy of chest X-ray and CT using artificial intelligence for osteoporosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:0
|作者:
Yamamoto, Norio
[1
,2
,3
]
Shiroshita, Akihiro
[2
,4
]
Kimura, Ryota
[2
,5
]
Kamo, Tomohiko
[2
,6
]
Ogihara, Hirofumi
[2
,7
]
Tsuge, Takahiro
[1
,2
,8
]
机构:
[1] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Epidemiol, Okayama, Japan
[2] Sci Res WorkS Peer Support Grp SRWS PSG, Osaka, Japan
[3] Hashimoto Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, 902-1 Saitanishi, Mitoya, Kagawa 7680103, Japan
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Epidemiol, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Akita Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Akita, Japan
[6] Gunma Paz Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Gunma, Japan
[7] Nagano Univ Hlth & Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Rehabil, Div Phys Therapy, Nagano, Japan
[8] Kurashiki Med Ctr, Dept Rehabil, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
关键词:
Osteoporosis;
Osteopenia;
Artificial intelligence;
Chest radiograph;
Computed tomography;
D O I:
10.1007/s00774-024-01532-4
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems using chest images are potentially reliable for diagnosing osteoporosis. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of chest X-ray and computed tomography (CT) scans using AI for osteoporosis in accordance with the diagnostic test accuracy guidelines. We included any type of study investigating the diagnostic accuracy of index test for osteoporosis. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and IEEE Xplore Digital Library on November 8, 2023. The main outcome measures were the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for osteoporosis and osteopenia. We described forest plots for sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. The summary points were estimated from the bivariate random-effects models. We summarized the overall quality of evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Results Nine studies with 11,369 participants were included in this review. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of chest X-rays for the diagnosis of osteoporosis were 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75, 0.89), 0.76 (95% CI 0.71, 0.80), and 0.86 (95% CI 0.83, 0.89), respectively (certainty of the evidence, low). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of chest CT for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and osteopenia were 0.83 (95% CI 0.69, 0.92) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.61, 0.77), respectively (certainty of the evidence, low and very low). Conclusions This review suggests that chest X-ray with AI has a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, highlighting its potential for opportunistic screening. However, the risk of bias of patient selection in most studies were high. More research with adequate participants' selection criteria for screening tool will be needed in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 491
页数:9
相关论文