Diagnostic accuracy of chest X-ray and CT using artificial intelligence for osteoporosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Yamamoto, Norio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shiroshita, Akihiro [2 ,4 ]
Kimura, Ryota [2 ,5 ]
Kamo, Tomohiko [2 ,6 ]
Ogihara, Hirofumi [2 ,7 ]
Tsuge, Takahiro [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Epidemiol, Okayama, Japan
[2] Sci Res WorkS Peer Support Grp SRWS PSG, Osaka, Japan
[3] Hashimoto Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, 902-1 Saitanishi, Mitoya, Kagawa 7680103, Japan
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Epidemiol, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Akita Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Akita, Japan
[6] Gunma Paz Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Gunma, Japan
[7] Nagano Univ Hlth & Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Rehabil, Div Phys Therapy, Nagano, Japan
[8] Kurashiki Med Ctr, Dept Rehabil, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
关键词
Osteoporosis; Osteopenia; Artificial intelligence; Chest radiograph; Computed tomography;
D O I
10.1007/s00774-024-01532-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems using chest images are potentially reliable for diagnosing osteoporosis. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of chest X-ray and computed tomography (CT) scans using AI for osteoporosis in accordance with the diagnostic test accuracy guidelines. We included any type of study investigating the diagnostic accuracy of index test for osteoporosis. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and IEEE Xplore Digital Library on November 8, 2023. The main outcome measures were the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for osteoporosis and osteopenia. We described forest plots for sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. The summary points were estimated from the bivariate random-effects models. We summarized the overall quality of evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Results Nine studies with 11,369 participants were included in this review. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of chest X-rays for the diagnosis of osteoporosis were 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75, 0.89), 0.76 (95% CI 0.71, 0.80), and 0.86 (95% CI 0.83, 0.89), respectively (certainty of the evidence, low). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of chest CT for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and osteopenia were 0.83 (95% CI 0.69, 0.92) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.61, 0.77), respectively (certainty of the evidence, low and very low). Conclusions This review suggests that chest X-ray with AI has a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, highlighting its potential for opportunistic screening. However, the risk of bias of patient selection in most studies were high. More research with adequate participants' selection criteria for screening tool will be needed in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 491
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of chest X-ray and CT using artificial intelligence for osteoporosis: systematic review and meta-analysis (Aug, 10.1007/s00774-024-01532-4, 2024)
    Yamamoto, Norio
    Shiroshita, Akihiro
    Kimura, Ryota
    Kamo, Tomohiko
    Ogihara, Hirofumi
    Tsuge, Takahiro
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM, 2024, 42 (06) : 754 - 756
  • [2] Artificial intelligence for X-ray scaphoid fracture detection: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis
    Kraus, Matan
    Anteby, Roi
    Konen, Eli
    Eshed, Iris
    Klang, Eyal
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (07) : 4341 - 4351
  • [3] Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models in detecting osteoporosis using dental images: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khadivi, Gita
    Akhtari, Abtin
    Sharifi, Farshad
    Zargarian, Nicolette
    Esmaeili, Saharnaz
    Ahsaie, Mitra Ghazizadeh
    Shahbazi, Soheil
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 36 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [4] Accuracy of Low-Dose Chest CT-Based Artificial Intelligence Models in Osteoporosis Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Huang Ya’nan
    Zhou Jianfeng
    Tang Wei
    Yang Jianfeng
    Zhao Zhenhua
    Calcified Tissue International, 116 (1)
  • [5] Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Chest X-ray for the Diagnosis of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tzeng, I-Shiang
    Hsieh, Po-Chun
    Su, Wen-Lin
    Hsieh, Tsung-Han
    Chang, Sheng-Chang
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (04)
  • [6] ACCURACY OF LUNG ULTRASOUND VERSUS CHEST X-RAY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PULMONARY EDEMA: A DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS
    Maw, Anna
    Hassanin, Ahmed
    Sertich, Anthony P.
    Salame, Gerard
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 : S104 - S104
  • [7] Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting retinitis pigmentosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Musleh, Ayman Mohammed
    AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen
    Abid, Mohammad Naim
    Salem, Yahia
    Hamila, Haitham Mounir
    Sallam, Ahmed B.
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 69 (03) : 411 - 417
  • [8] Artificial intelligence in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Mcgenity, Clare
    Clarke, Emily L.
    Jennings, Charlotte
    Matthews, Gillian
    Cartlidge, Caroline
    Freduah-Agyemang, Henschel
    Stocken, Deborah D.
    Treanor, Darren
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [9] The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in thoracic diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Yi
    Jin, Gang
    Pang, Yao
    Wang, Wenhao
    Zhang, Hongyi
    Tuo, Guangxin
    Wu, Peng
    Wang, Zequan
    Zhu, Zijiang
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (07)
  • [10] Accuracy of deep learning for automated detection of pneumonia using chest X-Ray images: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Zhenyan
    Dai, Cong
    Dong, Qiang
    Badrigilan, Samireh
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2020, 123