Dexamethasone Intracanalicular Insert for Clinically Significant fi cant Aqueous-Deficient Dry Eye A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:4
|
作者
Lin, Michael X. [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Lee [1 ]
Saldanha, Ian J.
VanCourt, Shanna [1 ,3 ]
Zeng, Julia [1 ,4 ]
Karakus, Sezen [1 ]
Hessen, Michelle [1 ]
Li, Gavin [1 ,5 ]
Akpek, Esen K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Wilmer Eye Inst, Ocular Surface Dis Clin, 1800 Orleans St,Woods 372, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Loyola Univ, Stritch Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY USA
关键词
Dry eye; Clinical trial; Treatment; DEXTENZA; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.03.010
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate a commercially available dexamethasone intracanalicular insert to treat dry eye. Design: Single-center, double-masked randomized controlled trial. Participants: Patients with clinically significant aqueous-deficient dry eye (combined ocular surface staining score, >= 3 [0-12]; corneal fluorescein staining score, >= 2 [0-6]; and Schirmer's wetting, < 10 mm at 5 minutes in both eyes) with symptoms (dryness, eye discomfort, or visual fatigue, >= 30 [0-100]) despite treatment with at least 1 prescription drop and deemed candidates for topical steroid therapy. Methods: Seventy-five adult patients were enrolled. A 1:1 randomization sequence was used to determine which eye of each patient would receive the treatment (dexamethasone 0.4-mg intracanalicular insert with 30-day elution time) or sham (collagen plug). The fellow eye received the opposite treatment. Patients were masked to treatment assignment. Follow-up visits (at weeks 2, 4, and 6) were performed by a masked investigator. Main outcome measures: Dry eye parameters and patient symptoms were used for efficacy, and intraocular pressure (IOP) was used for safety assessment. Results: The severity of dry eye was comparable between the treatment arms (fellow eyes) at baseline. Eyes that received the dexamethasone insert showed significantly less corneal staining at week 4 (mean difference [MD], -0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.91 to -0.19) and conjunctival staining at week 4 (MD, -0.68; 95% CI, -1.05 to -0.30) and week 6 (MD, -0.34; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.02). Schirmer's wetting was comparable between the two treatment arms. Although the patients reported less dryness in eyes that received the insert at week 4 (MD, -5.5; 95% CI, -11.4 to 0.4), no statistically significant differences were found in any patient-reported symptoms. At week 4, dexamethasone-treated eyes were more likely to show an IOP increase (by 5-10 mmHg; 9 eyes vs. 1 eye; relative risk, 9.00; 95% CI, 1.14-71.0). All cases of increased IOP were managed with short-term topical beta-blockers and subsided. Conclusions: The dexamethasone intracanalicular insert may be considered a dropless dual treatment for clinically significant aqueous-deficient dry eye when topical steroid treatment is deemed appropriate.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1044
页数:12
相关论文
共 2 条