Hindsight Bias in Forensic Mental Health Novices and Experts: An Exploratory Study

被引:1
作者
Weber, Michael A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Albrecht, Joelle N. [2 ,4 ]
Endrass, Jerome [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Humbel, Delia [2 ]
Meier, Dominique R. [6 ]
Singh, Jay P. [1 ,7 ]
Gerth, Juliane [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Konstanz, Dept Psychol, Univ Str 10, D-78464 Constance, Germany
[2] Off Correct & Rehabil, Dept Justice & Home Affairs, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Psychiat Clin, Forens Clin, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich, Univ Childrens Hosp Zurich, Child Dev Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Univ Basel, Dept Forens Psychiat, Basel, Switzerland
[6] Arxhof Ctr Court Ordered Treatment Young Adults Ma, Psychol Forens Serv, Niederdorf, Switzerland
[7] Publicat Acad Inc, Great Falls, VA USA
关键词
Cognitive bias; debiasing; risk assessment; expertise; recidivism; DECISION-MAKING; JUDGMENTS;
D O I
10.1080/24732850.2024.2396991
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Decision-making processes are vulnerable to cognitive biases like hindsight bias, with particularly fateful consequences in forensic contexts. However, while debiasing strategies have been effective in various areas, their impact in forensics is underexplored. We investigated hindsight bias and a simple awareness-based debiasing strategy in novices (n = 52) and forensic professionals (n = 49). Participants were assigned to baseline, biased, or debiased conditions and rated an offender's risk of re-offending using case vignettes. Significant hindsight bias was found in novices, but not experts who were also more aware of biases. Debiasing proved effective in novices, indicating that raising awareness may enhance equitable forensic decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Is Hindsight Really 20/20?: The Impact of Outcome Information on the Decision-Making Process [J].
Beltrani, Amanda ;
Reed, Amanda L. ;
Zapf, Patricia A. ;
Otto, Randy K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH, 2018, 17 (03) :285-296
[2]   The Impact of Cognitive Biases on Professionals' Decision-Making: A Review of Four Occupational Areas [J].
Berthet, Vincent .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 12
[3]   Most items in structured risk assessment instruments do not predict violence [J].
Coid, Jeremy W. ;
Yang, Min ;
Ullrich, Simone ;
Zhang, Tianqiang ;
Sizmur, Steve ;
Farrington, David ;
Rogers, Robert .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY & PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 22 (01) :3-21
[4]   Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing [J].
Croskerry, Pat ;
Singhal, Geeta ;
Mamede, Silvia .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 :ii58-ii64
[5]   Educational and Training Models in Forensic Psychology [J].
DeMatteo, David ;
Marczyk, Geoffrey ;
Krauss, Daniel A. ;
Burl, Jeffrey .
TRAINING AND EDUCATION IN PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 3 (03) :184-191
[6]  
Desmarais S.L., 2020, Marquette Law Review, V103, P793
[7]   Taking Forensic Mental Health Assessment "Out of the Lab" and into "the Real World": Introduction to the Special Issue on the Field Utility of Forensic Assessment Instruments and Procedures [J].
Edens, John F. ;
Boccaccini, Marcus T. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2017, 29 (06) :599-610
[9]   Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Buchner, Axel ;
Lang, Albert-Georg .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :1149-1160
[10]   The predictive performance of criminal risk assessment tools used at sentencing: Systematic review of validation studies [J].
Fazel, Seena ;
Burghart, Matthias ;
Fanshawe, Thomas ;
Gil, Sharon Danielle ;
Monahan, John ;
Yu, Rongqin .
JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2022, 81