Life Cycle Assessment of Microalgal Biomass Valorization from a Wastewater Treatment Process

被引:0
|
作者
Crippa, Irene [1 ]
Dolci, Giovanni [1 ]
Grosso, Mario [1 ]
Rigamonti, Lucia [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn DICA, Piazza Leonardo Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Life cycle assessment (LCA); Microalgae; Wastewater; Resource recovery; Biostimulant; Fertilizer; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; BIOSTIMULANTS;
D O I
10.1007/s12649-024-02695-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PurposeThe life cycle assessment (LCA) performed in this work evaluates the potential environmental impacts of an activated-sludge-based wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) coupled with microalgal cultivation, including the algal biomass recovery. The system is compared with the WWTP without algal integration to evaluate the potential benefits derived by the coupling. In addition to more conventional valorization strategies for the algal biomass, a special focus is given to the production of biostimulants, that give the chance to replace some chemical fertilizers.MethodFour scenarios are compared. They differ in the algal biomass valorization route: direct use in agriculture (S1), incineration with energy recovery (S2), use in cement plant as an auxiliary fuel (S3), and biostimulants production and use on crops (S4). The environmental impacts of the system are assessed including 16 categories, to comprehensively cover its potential impacts.ResultsS4 allows for significant impact reductions (compared to the WWTP without algal integration) only when the increase of the nutrient-uptake efficiency of crops is taken into account. Assuming a 5% reduction of fertilizers application, S4 shows an improvement in 14 out of the 16 impact categories. Conversely, when the amount of substituted fertilizers is calculated comparing just the macronutrient content of biostimulants with that of algae, S4 is comparable with S1, S2, and S3, where just four to five impact categories show lower impacts than the WWTP without algal integration.ConclusionsThe LCA confirms the environmental benefits of biostimulants application on crops, although the modeling approach requires further research as it strongly influences the results. center dot The study analyzes algal cultivation and wastewater treatment integration.center dot The system is analyzed from an environmental point of view, using the LCA methodology.center dot Several algal biomass valorizations are analyzed, including biostimulants production.center dot The LCA confirms the environmental benefits of biostimulants application on crops.center dot The modeling of biostimulants benefits on crops strongly influences the results.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 541
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Statistical analysis of sustainable production of algal biomass from wastewater treatment process
    Ambat, Indu
    Tang, Walter Z.
    Sillanpaa, Mika
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2019, 120 : 471 - 478
  • [22] A comprehensive review of life cycle assessment (LCA) of microalgal and lignocellulosic bioenergy products from thermochemical processes
    Ubando, Aristotle T.
    Rivera, Diana Rose T.
    Chen, Wei-Hsin
    Culaba, Alvin B.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 291
  • [23] Carotenoids from wastewater-grown microalgae biomass: Life cycle assessment and techno-economical analysis
    Ferreira, Jessica
    Braga, Matheus Quinta
    da Gama, Rafael Carvalho Nogueira
    Magalha, Iara Barbosa
    Marangon, Bianca Barros
    Castro, Jackeline de Siqueira
    Lorentz, Juliana Ferreira
    Henriques, Bruno Silva
    Pereira, Alexia Saleme Aona de Paula
    Assemany, Paula Peixoto
    Calijuri, Maria Lucia
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [24] Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of hydrogen production from biowaste and biomass in Sweden
    Arfan, Muhammad
    Eriksson, Ola
    Wang, Zhao
    Soam, Shveta
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 291
  • [25] Data management in life cycle assessment: a case study of wastewater treatment
    Straub, Julia
    Hofmann, Josef
    Hehenberger-Risse, Diana
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 88 (01) : 123 - 135
  • [26] Environmental Life Cycle Costing and Sustainability: Insights from Pollution Abatement and Resource Recovery in Wastewater Treatment
    Hall, Murray R.
    Priestley, Anthony
    Muster, Tim H.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2018, 22 (05) : 1127 - 1138
  • [27] Improving the Energy Balance of an Integrated Microalgal Wastewater Treatment Process
    Ometto, Francesco
    Whitton, Rachel
    Coulon, Frederic
    Jefferson, Bruce
    Villa, Raffaella
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2014, 5 (02) : 245 - 253
  • [28] Life cycle assessment of side stream removal and recovery of nitrogen from wastewater treatment plants
    van Zelm, Rosalie
    Seroa da Motta, Raquel de Paiva
    Lam, Wan Yee
    Menkveld, Wilbert
    Broeders, Eddie
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (04) : 913 - 922
  • [29] Improving the Energy Balance of an Integrated Microalgal Wastewater Treatment Process
    Francesco Ometto
    Rachel Whitton
    Frédéric Coulon
    Bruce Jefferson
    Raffaella Villa
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2014, 5 : 245 - 253
  • [30] Life Cycle Assessment and Its Application in Wastewater Treatment: A Brief Overview
    Rashid, Siti Safirah
    Harun, Siti Norliyana
    Hanafiah, Marlia M. M.
    Razman, Khalisah K. K.
    Liu, Yong-Qiang
    Tholibon, Duratul Ain
    PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (01)