A Machine Learning Framework for Melt-Pool Geometry Prediction and Process Parameter Optimization in the Laser Powder-Bed Fusion Process

被引:1
作者
Rahman, M. Shafiqur [1 ]
Sattar, Naw Safrin [2 ]
Ahmed, Radif Uddin [1 ]
Ciaccio, Jonathan [3 ]
Chakravarty, Uttam K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana Tech Univ, Dept Mech Engn, 505 Tech Dr, Ruston, LA 71270 USA
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, 1 Bethel Valley Rd, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA
[3] Univ New Orleans, Dept Mech Engn, 2000 Lakeshore Dr, New Orleans, LA 70148 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2024年 / 146卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
laser powder-bed fusion; Ti-6Al-4V; machine learning; melt-pool width; melt-pool depth; optimization; sensitivity;
D O I
10.1115/1.4065687
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This study presents a cost-effective and high-precision machine learning (ML) method for predicting the melt-pool geometry and optimizing the process parameters in the laser powder-bed fusion (LPBF) process with Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Unlike many ML models, the presented method incorporates five key features, including three process parameters (laser power, scanning speed, and spot size) and two material parameters (layer thickness and powder porosity). The target variables are the melt-pool width and depth that collectively define the melt-pool geometry and give insight into the melt-pool dynamics in LPBF. The dataset integrates information from an extensive literature survey, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling, and laser melting experiments. Multiple ML regression methods are assessed to determine the best model to predict the melt-pool geometry. Tenfold cross-validation is applied to evaluate the model performance using five evaluation metrics. Several data pre-processing, augmentation, and feature engineering techniques are performed to improve the accuracy of the models. Results show that the "Extra Trees regression" and "Gaussian process regression" models yield the least errors for predicting melt-pool width and depth, respectively. The ML modeling results are compared with the experimental and CFD modeling results to validate the proposed ML models. The most influential parameter affecting the melt-pool geometry is also determined by the sensitivity analysis. The processing parameters are optimized using an iterative grid search method employing the trained ML models. The presented ML framework offers computational speed and simplicity, which can be implemented in other additive manufacturing techniques to comprehend the critical traits.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Ahmed Radif Uddin, 2023, APPL MACHINE LEARNIN, V4
  • [2] Data-Driven Approaches for Bead Geometry Prediction Via Melt Pool Monitoring
    Alexander, Zoe
    Feldhausen, Thomas
    Saleeby, Kyle
    Kurfess, Thomas
    Fu, Katherine
    Saldana, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2023, 145 (09):
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, Progress in Additive Manufacturing, DOI [10.1007/s40964-017-0030-2, DOI 10.1007/S40964-017-0030-2]
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2007, GLOBAL SENSITIVITY A, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470725184.CH6
  • [5] A Supervised Machine Learning Model for Regression to Predict Melt Pool Formation and Morphology in Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    Baldi, Niccolo
    Giorgetti, Alessandro
    Polidoro, Alessandro
    Palladino, Marco
    Giovannetti, Iacopo
    Arcidiacono, Gabriele
    Citti, Paolo
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [6] In-situ crack and keyhole pore detection in laser directed energy deposition through acoustic signal and deep learning
    Chen, Lequn
    Yao, Xiling
    Tan, Chaolin
    He, Weiyang
    Su, Jinlong
    Weng, Fei
    Chew, Youxiang
    Ng, Nicholas Poh Huat
    Moon, Seung Ki
    [J]. ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2023, 69
  • [7] Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Potential Superalloys: A Review
    Cobbinah, Prince Valentine
    Nzeukou, Rivel Armil
    Onawale, Omoyemi Temitope
    Matizamhuka, Wallace Rwisayi
    [J]. METALS, 2021, 11 (01) : 1 - 37
  • [8] Keyhole threshold and morphology in laser melting revealed by ultrahigh-speed x-ray imaging
    Cunningham, Ross
    Zhao, Cang
    Parab, Niranjan
    Kantzos, Christopher
    Pauza, Joseph
    Fezzaa, Kamel
    Sun, Tao
    Rollett, Anthony D.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2019, 363 (6429) : 849 - +
  • [9] Optical tomography and machine learning for in-situ defects detection in laser powder bed fusion: A self-organizing map and U-Net based approach
    Ero, Osazee
    Taherkhani, Katayoon
    Toyserkani, Ehsan
    [J]. ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2023, 78
  • [10] Architecture-Driven Physics-Informed Deep Learning for Temperature Prediction in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing With Limited Data
    Ghungrad, Suyog
    Faegh, Meysam
    Gould, Benjamin
    Wolff, Sarah J.
    Haghighi, Azadeh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2023, 145 (08):