Machine Learning Based Prediction of Imminent ICP Insults During Neurocritical Care of Traumatic Brain Injury

被引:2
作者
Galos, Peter [1 ]
Hult, Ludvig [2 ]
Zachariah, Dave [2 ]
Lewen, Anders [1 ]
Hanell, Anders [1 ]
Howells, Timothy [1 ]
Schon, Thomas B. [2 ]
Enblad, Per [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Div Neurosurg, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Informat Technol, Div Syst & Control, Uppsala, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
TBI; AI; Machine learning; Intracranial hypertension; Critical care; INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12028-024-02119-7
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn neurointensive care, increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is a feared secondary brain insult in traumatic brain injury (TBI). A system that predicts ICP insults before they emerge may facilitate early optimization of the physiology, which may in turn lead to stopping the predicted ICP insult from occurring. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of different artificial intelligence models in predicting the risk of ICP insults.MethodsThe models were trained to predict risk of ICP insults starting within 30 min, using the Uppsala high frequency TBI dataset. A restricted dataset consisting of only monitoring data were used, and an unrestricted dataset using monitoring data as well as clinical data, demographic data, and radiological evaluations was used. Four different model classes were compared: Gaussian process regression, logistic regression, random forest classifier, and Extreme Gradient Boosted decision trees (XGBoost).ResultsSix hundred and two patients with TBI were included (total monitoring 138,411 h). On the task of predicting upcoming ICP insults, the Gaussian process regression model performed similarly on the Uppsala high frequency TBI dataset (sensitivity 93.2%, specificity 93.9%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 98.3%), as in earlier smaller studies. Using a more flexible model (XGBoost) resulted in a comparable performance (sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 94.6%, AUROC 98.7%). Adding more clinical variables and features further improved the performance of the models slightly (XGBoost: sensitivity 94.1%, specificity of 94.6%, AUROC 98.8%).ConclusionsArtificial intelligence models have potential to become valuable tools for predicting ICP insults in advance during neurointensive care. The fact that common off-the-shelf models, such as XGBoost, performed well in predicting ICP insults opens new possibilities that can lead to faster advances in the field and earlier clinical implementations.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 397
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [21] Introduction of the Uppsala Traumatic Brain Injury register for regular surveillance of patient characteristics and neurointensive care management including secondary insult quantification and clinical outcome
    Nyholm, Lena
    Howells, Tim
    Enblad, Per
    Lewen, Anders
    [J]. UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 118 (03) : 169 - 180
  • [22] Pedregosa F, 2011, J MACH LEARN RES, V12, P2825
  • [23] Prediction of intracranial pressure crises after severe traumatic brain injury using machine learning algorithms
    Petrov, Dmitriy
    Miranda, Stephen P.
    Balu, Ramani
    Wathen, Connor
    Vaz, Alex
    Mohan, Vinodh
    Colon, Christian
    Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 139 (02) : 528 - 535
  • [24] AI in health and medicine
    Rajpurkar, Pranav
    Chen, Emma
    Banerjee, Oishi
    Topol, Eric J.
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2022, 28 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [25] Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Vergouwe, Yvonne
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (29) : 1925 - +
  • [26] Impact of the Choice of Cross-Validation Techniques on the Results of Machine Learning-Based Diagnostic Applications
    Tougui, Ilias
    Jilbab, Abdelilah
    El Mhamdi, Jamal
    [J]. HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH, 2021, 27 (03) : 189 - 199
  • [27] Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict Intracranial Hypertension in Patients After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review
    van Hal, S. T.
    van der Jagt, M.
    van Genderen, M. E.
    Gommers, D.
    Veenland, J. F.
    [J]. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2024, 41 (01) : 285 - 296
  • [28] VanRossum G., 2009, PYTHON 3 REFERENCE M
  • [29] Varoquaux G., 2023, Machine Learning for Brain Disorders, P601, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3195-920, 10.1007/978-1-0716-3195-9_20, DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3195-9_20]
  • [30] Decision curve analysis: A novel method for evaluating prediction models
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Elkin, Elena B.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2006, 26 (06) : 565 - 574