Machine Learning Based Prediction of Imminent ICP Insults During Neurocritical Care of Traumatic Brain Injury

被引:2
作者
Galos, Peter [1 ]
Hult, Ludvig [2 ]
Zachariah, Dave [2 ]
Lewen, Anders [1 ]
Hanell, Anders [1 ]
Howells, Timothy [1 ]
Schon, Thomas B. [2 ]
Enblad, Per [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Div Neurosurg, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Informat Technol, Div Syst & Control, Uppsala, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
TBI; AI; Machine learning; Intracranial hypertension; Critical care; INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12028-024-02119-7
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn neurointensive care, increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is a feared secondary brain insult in traumatic brain injury (TBI). A system that predicts ICP insults before they emerge may facilitate early optimization of the physiology, which may in turn lead to stopping the predicted ICP insult from occurring. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of different artificial intelligence models in predicting the risk of ICP insults.MethodsThe models were trained to predict risk of ICP insults starting within 30 min, using the Uppsala high frequency TBI dataset. A restricted dataset consisting of only monitoring data were used, and an unrestricted dataset using monitoring data as well as clinical data, demographic data, and radiological evaluations was used. Four different model classes were compared: Gaussian process regression, logistic regression, random forest classifier, and Extreme Gradient Boosted decision trees (XGBoost).ResultsSix hundred and two patients with TBI were included (total monitoring 138,411 h). On the task of predicting upcoming ICP insults, the Gaussian process regression model performed similarly on the Uppsala high frequency TBI dataset (sensitivity 93.2%, specificity 93.9%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 98.3%), as in earlier smaller studies. Using a more flexible model (XGBoost) resulted in a comparable performance (sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 94.6%, AUROC 98.7%). Adding more clinical variables and features further improved the performance of the models slightly (XGBoost: sensitivity 94.1%, specificity of 94.6%, AUROC 98.8%).ConclusionsArtificial intelligence models have potential to become valuable tools for predicting ICP insults in advance during neurointensive care. The fact that common off-the-shelf models, such as XGBoost, performed well in predicting ICP insults opens new possibilities that can lead to faster advances in the field and earlier clinical implementations.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 397
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PYTHON PACKAGE INDEX
  • [2] Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition
    Carney, Nancy
    Totten, Annette M.
    O'Reilly, Cindy
    Ullman, Jamie S.
    Hawryluk, Gregory W. J.
    Bell, Michael J.
    Bratton, Susan L.
    Chesnut, Randall
    Harris, Odette A.
    Kissoon, Niranjan
    Rubiano, Andres M.
    Shutter, Lori
    Tasker, Robert C.
    Vavilala, Monica S.
    Wilberger, Jack
    Wright, David W.
    Ghajar, Jamshid
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (01) : 6 - 15
  • [3] Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for the Early Prediction of Doses of Harmful Intracranial Pressure in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
    Carra, Giorgia
    Guiza, Fabian
    Piper, Ian
    Citerio, Giuseppe
    Maas, Andrew
    Depreitere, Bart
    Meyfroidt, Geert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2023, 40 (5-6) : 514 - 522
  • [4] Prediction model for intracranial hypertension demonstrates robust performance during external validation on the CENTER-TBI dataset
    Carra, Giorgia
    Guiza, Fabian
    Depreitere, Bart
    Meyfroidt, Geert
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 47 (01) : 124 - 126
  • [5] XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
    Chen, Tianqi
    Guestrin, Carlos
    [J]. KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, : 785 - 794
  • [6] THE ROLE OF SECONDARY BRAIN INJURY IN DETERMINING OUTCOME FROM SEVERE HEAD-INJURY
    CHESNUT, RM
    MARSHALL, LF
    KLAUBER, MR
    BLUNT, BA
    BALDWIN, N
    EISENBERG, HM
    JANE, JA
    MARMAROU, A
    FOULKES, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1993, 34 (02) : 216 - 222
  • [7] Outcome after traumatic brain injury improved by an organized secondary insult program and standardized neurointensive care
    Elf, K
    Nilsson, P
    Enblad, P
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (09) : 2129 - 2134
  • [8] An experimental comparison of performance measures for classification
    Ferri, C.
    Hernandez-Orallo, J.
    Modroiu, R.
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2009, 30 (01) : 27 - 38
  • [9] Capturing of intracranial pressure treatment during neurointensive care in patients with acute brain injury using a novel tablet-based method
    Galos, Peter
    Nyholm, Lena
    Howells, Tim
    Enblad, Per
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2022, 36 (06) : 1731 - 1738
  • [10] Guiza Fabian, 2017, Crit Care Med, V45, pe316, DOI 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002080