Ethical analysis of informed consent methods in longitudinal cohort studies: A Chinese perspective

被引:0
作者
Li, Kun [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Mingtao [1 ,2 ]
Zhai, Xiaomei [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Chen [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Bioeth, Sch Populat Med & Publ Hlth, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Bioeth Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Union Med Coll, Sch Populat Med & Publ Hlth, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
cohort studies; informed consent; trust;
D O I
10.1111/dewb.12460
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In longitudinal cohort studies involving large populations over extended periods, informed consent entails numerous urgent challenges. This paper explores challenges regarding informed consent in long-term, large-scale longitudinal cohort studies based on the longitudinal and dynamic nature of such research. It analyzes and evaluates widely recognized broad consent and dynamic consent methods, highlighting limitations concerning their ability to adapt to evolving research objectives and participant perspectives. This paper discusses trust-based informed consent and emphasizes the needs to establish and maintain trust with research participants and to balance information disclosure with respect for participants' autonomy. Informed consent in long-term studies is an evolving process that must adapt to changing research environments. Based on participant trust, researchers should observe and assess potential research risks. Finally, the paper recommends enhancing institutional credibility, implementing reconsent procedures, and ensuring robust ethical oversight to safeguard participants' rights despite the complexity of modern biomedical research.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Barnes Linda, 2005, Bull Med Ethics, P17
  • [2] Methods and principles in biomedical ethics
    Beauchamp, TL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2003, 29 (05) : 269 - 274
  • [3] Informed Consent: Its History, Meaning, and Present Challenges
    Beauchamp, Tom L.
    [J]. CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 2011, 20 (04) : 515 - 523
  • [4] Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis
    D'Abramo, Flavio
    Schildmann, Jan
    Vollmann, Jochen
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2015, 16
  • [5] Views of US researchers about informed consent in international collaborative research
    Dawson, L
    Kass, NE
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 61 (06) : 1211 - 1222
  • [6] Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer
    Edwards, Brenda K.
    Noone, Anne-Michelle
    Mariotto, Angela B.
    Simard, Edgar P.
    Boscoe, Francis P.
    Henley, S. Jane
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    Cho, Hyunsoon
    Anderson, Robert N.
    Kohler, Betsy A.
    Eheman, Christie R.
    Ward, Elizabeth M.
    [J]. CANCER, 2014, 120 (09) : 1290 - 1314
  • [7] Ellerin Bruce E, 2005, J Am Coll Radiol, V2, P919, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.03.016
  • [8] Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
    Fletcher, Ben
    Gheorghe, Adrian
    Moore, David
    Wilson, Sue
    Damery, Sarah
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (01):
  • [9] Meeting the Governance Challenges of Next-Generation Biorepository Research
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    Anderson, Nicholas R.
    Guzauskas, Greg
    Freeman, Dena
    Fryer-Edwards, Kelly
    [J]. SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2010, 2 (15)
  • [10] Sharing genomic data for health research: institutional trust and trustworthiness, and informed consent
    Graham, Mackenzie
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2022, 194 (44) : E1511 - E1512