Effectiveness and safety of polyethylene-glycol-4000 versus sodium picosulphate plus magnesium oxide and citric acid for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy in children: A systematic review with meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Furio, Silvia [1 ]
Lucarini, Alessio [2 ]
Mennini, Maurizio [1 ]
Strisciuglio, Caterina [3 ]
Felici, Enrico [4 ]
Ferretti, Alessandro [1 ]
Parisi, Pasquale [1 ]
D'Angelo, Francesco [5 ]
Marasco, Giovanni [6 ,7 ]
Barbara, Giovanni [6 ,7 ]
Ricciardi, Luca [8 ]
Piccirillo, Marisa [1 ]
Di Nardo, Giovanni [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, St Andrea Univ Hosp, Fac Med & Psychol, Dept Neurosci Mental Hlth & Sensory Organs NESMOS,, Via Grottarossa 10351039, I-00189 Rome, Italy
[2] St Andrea Univ Hosp, Surg & Med Dept Translat Med, Gen Surg Unit, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Woman Child & Gen & Specialist Surg, Naples, Italy
[4] Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio & Biagio & Cesare A, Childrens Hosp, Pediat Unit, Alessandria, Italy
[5] Sapienza Univ Rome, St Andrea Univ Hosp, Fac Med & Psychol, Dept Neurosci Mental Hlth & Sensory Organs NESMOS,, Rome, Italy
[6] Univ Bologna, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Bologna, Italy
[7] IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Univ Bologna, Bologna, Italy
[8] Sapienza Univ Rome, St Andrea Univ Hosp, Fac Med & Psychol, Dept Neurosci Mental Hlth & Sensory Organs NESMOS,, Rome, Italy
关键词
bowel preparation; endoscopy; pediatric; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; ENDOSCOPY; GLYCOL; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1002/jpn3.12388
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Colonoscopy is performed for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The quality of colonoscopy depends on adequate bowel cleansing. However, there is no standardized protocol for bowel preparation in children. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to estimate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability profile of polyethylene glycol (PEG) compared with those of sodium picosulfate (SPMC) in children. The primary sources of the reviewed studies were Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. The databases were systematically searched for RCTs comparing PEG 4000 to SPMC as a bowel cleansing solution. Six studies were included. The analysis showed that both PEG and SPMC are effective for bowel cleansing, while a split-dose regimen may be preferable to a day-before one. There were no differences between the two groups regarding adverse events such as abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, bloating, and anal discomfort. Additionally, preparation with SPMC was preferred in terms of acceptability and compliance. Still, the need to place a nasogastric tube was significantly lower in the SPMC group compared to the PEG group and in the split dose regimen compared to the day before. In conclusion, PEG and SPMC are equally effective in obtaining an adequate bowel cleansing with a comparable adverse event rate; moreover, split-dose administration may be preferable to day-before one in terms of effective bowel cleansing. However, SPMC preparation is more acceptable seems to result in higher compliance, and to reduce the use of a nasogastric tube, that we encounter daily in clinical practice, is perceived as a stressful experience for children and their families. What is Known Colonoscopy is an important examination and depends on adequate bowel preparation. There are no standardized protocols for children, but polyethylene glycol (PEG) and sodium picosulfate (SPMC) are the most commonly used in pediatrics, with different administration regimens (day-before and split-dose).What is New PEG and SPMC are equally effective for bowel cleansing; moreover, split-dose administration may be preferable to day-before in terms of effective bowel cleansing. SPMC preparation is more tolerated by patients, has higher compliance, and avoids the use of a nasogastric tube.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 33
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [21] Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of elobixibat plus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate and split-dose 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for bowel preparation before outpatient colonoscopy: a study protocol for the multicentre, randomised, controlled E-PLUS trial
    Kinichi Hotta
    Yosuke Otake
    Daisuke Yamaguchi
    Yuichi Shimodate
    Norihiro Hanabata
    Hiroaki Ikematsu
    Yohei Yabuuchi
    Yasushi Sano
    Ryo Shimoda
    Shinya Sugimoto
    Mari Oba
    Hiroyuki Takamaru
    Kouichiro Kimura
    Yoshihiro Kishida
    Kazunori Takada
    Sayo Ito
    Kenichiro Imai
    Kazuya Hosotani
    Tatsuro Murano
    Masayoshi Yamada
    Kensuke Shinmura
    Rio Takezawa
    Michito Tomonaga
    Yutaka Saito
    BMC Gastroenterology, 24