Prediction of the Potentially Suitable Areas of Actinidia latifolia in China Based on Climate Change Using the Optimized MaxEnt Model

被引:2
作者
Wang, Zhi [1 ]
Luo, Minmin [1 ,2 ]
Ye, Lixia [1 ]
Peng, Jue [1 ]
Luo, Xuan [1 ]
Gao, Lei [1 ]
Huang, Qiong [1 ]
Chen, Qinghong [1 ]
Zhang, Lei [1 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Acad Agr Sci, Inst Fruit & Tea, Hubei Key Lab Germplasm Innovat & Utilizat Fruit T, Wuhan 430064, Peoples R China
[2] Yangtze Univ, Coll Hort & Gardening, Jingzhou 434023, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
kiwifruit; maximum entropy method; climate change; environmental factors; suitable habitat; conservation biology; VITAMIN-C; CULTIVATION; SUITABILITY; SENSITIVITY; COMPLEXITY; WHEAT;
D O I
10.3390/su16145975
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Actinidia latifolia, with the highest vitamin C content in its genus, is a unique wild relative of kiwifruit that could be important for genetic breeding research. Climate change significantly influences the distribution range of wild plants. Accurately assessing the potential distribution of wild kiwifruit and its response to climate change is crucial for the effective protection and sustainable utilization of its germplasm resources. In this study, we utilized the optimized MaxEnt model to predict the potential habitats of A. latifolia in China, employing the jackknife test to assess the importance of environmental variables in our modeling process. The results showed that annual precipitation (Bio12) and temperature annual range (Bio7) emerged as the most influential environmental variables affecting the distribution of this kiwifruit wild relative. As radiative forcing and time increase, the potential habitats of A. latifolia in China are projected to shrink southward, thereby exacerbating habitat fragmentation. This research offers significant scientific references for the investigation, protection, cultivation, and application of wild relatives of the kiwifruit.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] A quantitative synthesis of the importance of variables used in MaxEnt species distribution models
    Bradie, Johanna
    Leung, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2017, 44 (06) : 1344 - 1361
  • [2] SDMtoolbox 2.0: the next generation Python']Python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses
    Brown, Jason L.
    Bennett, Joseph R.
    French, Connor M.
    [J]. PEERJ, 2017, 5
  • [3] SDMtoolbox: a python']python-based GIS toolkit for landscape genetic, biogeographic and species distribution model analyses
    Brown, Jason L.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2014, 5 (07): : 694 - 700
  • [4] Beyond Predictions: Biodiversity Conservation in a Changing Climate
    Dawson, Terence P.
    Jackson, Stephen T.
    House, Joanna I.
    Prentice, Iain Colin
    Mace, Georgina M.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2011, 332 (6025) : 53 - 58
  • [5] Dynamic Changes in Ascorbic Acid Content during Fruit Development and Ripening of Actinidia latifolia (an Ascorbate-Rich Fruit Crop) and the Associated Molecular Mechanisms
    Deng, Honghong
    Xia, Hui
    Guo, Yuqi
    Liu, Xinling
    Lin, Lijin
    Wang, Jin
    Xu, Kunfu
    Lv, Xiulan
    Hu, Rongping
    Liang, Dong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (10)
  • [6] Diamond SE, 2011, ECOLOGY, V92, P1005, DOI 10.1890/i0012-9658-92-5-1005
  • [7] Drummond L, 2013, ADV FOOD NUTR RES, V68, P33, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-394294-4.00003-1
  • [8] Antioxidant capacity and the relationship with polyphenol and Vitamin C in Actinidia fruits
    Du, Guorong
    Li, Mingjun
    Ma, Fengwang
    Liang, Dong
    [J]. FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2009, 113 (02) : 557 - 562
  • [9] A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists
    Elith, Jane
    Phillips, Steven J.
    Hastie, Trevor
    Dudik, Miroslav
    Chee, Yung En
    Yates, Colin J.
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2011, 17 (01) : 43 - 57
  • [10] A comparison of the performance of threshold criteria for binary classification in terms of predicted prevalence and kappa
    Freeman, Elizabeth A.
    Moisen, Gretchen G.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2008, 217 (1-2) : 48 - 58