Assessing the IUCN global standard as a framework for nature-based solutions in river flood management applications

被引:7
作者
Berg, Maikel [1 ]
Spray, Chris J. [3 ]
Blom, Astrid [1 ]
Slinger, Jill H. [1 ]
Stancanelli, Laura M. [1 ]
Snoek, Yvo [2 ]
Schielen, Ralph M. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
[2] DG Rijkswaterstaat, Netherlands Minist Infrastructure & Water Manageme, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Dundee Univ, Dundee, Scotland
关键词
NbS; Assessment framework; Comparative assessment; Riverine flood risk reduction; Natural flood management; Building with nature; CO-BENEFITS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175269
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are actions that harness nature to help address major societal challenges. The assessment frameworks for NbS proposed in the literature differ in scope and intended use. In 2020, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) introduced their Global Standard for NbS as a framework that can be used by anyone working on different types of NbS. Since research on the applicability of the IUCN Standard remains limited, the aim of this paper is to analyse whether the IUCN Standard may be used as an overarching assessment framework for NbS in river flood management applications and to identify the main differences in content with other NbS-frameworks. This was achieved through a comparison with 29 assessment frameworks for NbS, that are applicable to physical interventions for riverine flood risk reduction. The comparisons showed that the IUCN Standard has the largest breadth in scope of application and may therefore be used as an overarching framework. In addition, we identified a distinction between frameworks for the assessment of project processes (process-oriented) and project results (results-oriented), where the IUCN Standard can be characterized as process-oriented. This implies that the IUCN Standard may be used to assess the processes (e. g. stakeholder engagement and adaptive management) of planned, ongoing or completed NbS projects for a wide variety of environmental contexts and societal challenges. This will help persuade policy makers to consider NbS as one of the solutions in flood management issues, next to or in combination with e.g. engineering solutions or changing land use. We also identified that, while the IUCN Standard is straightforward to use and incorporates stakeholder input, the environmental context specificity as well as guidance depth on resources for assessment can be improved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Multi-criteria Approach for Selection of Green and Grey Infrastructure to Reduce Flood Risk and Increase CO-benefits [J].
Alves, Alida ;
Gersonius, Berry ;
Sanchez, Arlex ;
Vojinovic, Zoran ;
Kapelan, Zoran .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 32 (07) :2505-2522
[2]  
Andrikopoulou T., 2020, Nature Based Solutions (NBS) for Fluvial Flood Mitigation: An Integrated Assessment Framework
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Financing Conservation and Nature-based Solutions
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, IUCN Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions, VFirst
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, The Paris Agreement
[6]  
Autuori S., 2019, PHUSICOS EU Horizon 2020
[7]   The Contribution of NBS to Urban Resilience in Stormwater Management and Control: A Framework with Stakeholder Validation [J].
Beceiro, Paula ;
Brito, Rita Salgado ;
Galvao, Ana .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (06)
[8]   Assessing the IUCN global standard for nature-based solutions in riverine flood risk mitigation [J].
Berg, Maikel ;
Spray, Chris J. ;
Blom, Astrid ;
Slinger, Jill H. ;
Stancanelli, Laura M. ;
Snoek, Yvo ;
Schielen, Ralph M. J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 51
[9]  
Bridges TS., 2021, International Guidelines on Natural and Nature-Based Features for Flood Risk Management
[10]   An assessment framework for climate-proof nature-based solutions [J].
Calliari, Elisa ;
Staccione, Andrea ;
Mysiak, Jaroslav .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 656 :691-700