Product Review Reading and Rating Statistics: How Do They Affect Consumer Product Evaluation?

被引:0
作者
Guan, Chong [1 ]
Lam, Shun Yin [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Univ Social Sci, Ctr Continuing & Profess Educ, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
consumer search behavior; expectancy confirmation; eye-tracking; online product reviews; product rating statistics; structural equation modeling; WORD-OF-MOUTH; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; ONLINE REVIEWS; MODERATING ROLE; INFORMATION; SEARCH; HELPFULNESS; DYNAMICS; SALES; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.1111/ijcs.13083
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Marketers are concerned about how consumers' readings of product reviews and product rating statistics affect product evaluations. Previous studies generally regard product review content and rating statistics as affecting product evaluations independently. This may not be true. Typically, consumers enter a review section with pre-existing positive expectations about a product. When they see a negative average rating in this section, their expectancies are disconfirmed. Their surprise stemming from the disconfirmation makes them read the reviews more carefully. Thus, review reading affects product evaluation more strongly when viewing a negative average rating. Conversely, a positive average rating results in expectancy confirmation, which weakens the effect of review reading. An eye-tracking experiment using a mock-resort review section supported these predictions. These findings have implications for marketers in behavioral advertising, responding to reviews, and consumers writing reviews.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 77 条
[51]   Effect of brand familiarity, experience and information on online apparel purchase [J].
Park, Jihye ;
Stoel, Leslie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RETAIL & DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT, 2005, 33 (02) :148-+
[52]   The Effect of Low- versus High-Variance in Product Reviews on Product Evaluation [J].
Park, Se-Bum ;
Park, Do-Hyung .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2013, 30 (07) :543-554
[53]   Observational learning: Influence of regulatory focus, knowledge, and summarized observable recommendations on consumer decision outcomes in an online environment [J].
Patil, Ashutosh ;
Malhotra, Naresh K. ;
Maity, Moutusy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2022, 46 (04) :1428-1450
[54]  
Petty R. E., 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
[55]   Stranger danger? Cue-based trust in online consumer product review videos [J].
Pfeuffer, Alexander ;
Phua, Joe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2022, 46 (03) :964-983
[56]  
Reczek R. W., 2016, Targeted Ads Don't Just Make You More Likely to BuyThey can Change how You Think About Yourself.
[57]  
Roese NealJ., 2007, Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, V2nd, P91, DOI DOI 10.1080/09638288.2018.1555618
[58]   RELIABILITY-MEASURES FOR QUALITATIVE DATA - THEORY AND IMPLICATIONS [J].
RUST, RT ;
COOIL, B .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1994, 31 (01) :1-14
[59]   Understanding digital consumer: A review, synthesis, and future research agenda [J].
Sagkaya Gungor, Aysegul ;
Ozansoy cadirci, Tugce .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2022, 46 (05) :1829-1858
[60]   Can including pros and cons increase the helpfulness and persuasiveness of online reviews? The interactive effects of ratings and arguments [J].
Schlosser, Ann E. .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 21 (03) :226-239