The Effect of Swirl Number on Lean Blow Out Limits of Lean Direct Injection Combustors

被引:1
作者
Aradhey, Yogesh [1 ,2 ]
Stroud, Zachary [1 ,2 ]
Meadows, Joseph [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, 445 Goodwin Hall,MC 0238,635 Prices Fork Rd, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] State Univ, 445 Goodwin Hall,MC 0238,635 Prices Fork Rd, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2024年 / 146卷 / 10期
关键词
FLAMES; MECHANISMS; SPRAY; FLOW;
D O I
10.1115/1.4065218
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This is the first study where a single variable sweep of SN is conducted to assess its impact on lean blowout limits (LBO) in a liquid-fueled lean direct injection (LDI) combustor. This study uses a scaled NASA SV-LDI (Swirl Venturi-Lean Direct Injection) hardware and is concerned with the impact of swirl number on the lean blow-out limit of a single-element LDI system at atmospheric pressure. The swirl numbers (SN) were varied from 0.31 to 0.66 using continuously variable active swirl number control system that was developed in-house. It is shown that the minimum operating equivalence ratio is a linearly increasing function of swirl number. While previous literature agrees with the positive slope for this correlation, past work has suggested that the LBO limit is proportional to the swirler vane angle which is shown to be untrue for LDI systems. By actively varying the swirl number, it is proven that LBO is proportional to SN, and it is well known that SN is not proportional to swirler vane angle. Increased SN reduces LBO margin because the better-mixed, high swirl dilutes locally rich pockets of fuel-air mixture in a globally lean flow. In addition to a baseline venturi, which was scaled from NASA's geometry, two other venturis were tested. A low-pressure loss venturi with a large throat diameter showed poor blow-out performance whereas a parabolically profiled venturi improved LBO over the baseline for the same swirl number.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Alkabie H.S., 2015, ASME 1988 INT GAS TU, DOI [10.1115/88-GT-245, DOI 10.1115/88-GT-245]
[2]   Lean blowout model for a spray-fired swirl-stabilized combustor [J].
Ateshkadi, A ;
McDonell, VG ;
Samuelsen, GS .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2000, 28 (01) :1281-1288
[3]  
Beer J.M., 1972, COMBUSTION AERODYNAM
[4]   Influence of key geometrical features on the non-reacting flow of a Lean Direct Injection (LDI) combustor through Large-Eddy Simulation and a Design of Experiments [J].
Carreres, M. ;
Garcia-Tiscar, J. ;
Belmar-Gil, M. ;
Cervello-Sanz, D. .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 126
[5]   Investigation of Flow Characteristics in Lean Direct Injection Combustors [J].
Dewanji, D. ;
Rao, A. G. ;
Pourquie, M. ;
van Buijtenen, J. P. .
JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2012, 28 (01) :181-196
[6]   Fuel effects on lean blow-out in a realistic gas turbine combustor [J].
Esclapez, Lucas ;
Ma, Peter C. ;
Mayhew, Eric ;
Xu, Rui ;
Stouffer, Scott ;
Lee, Tonghun ;
Wang, Hai ;
Ihme, Matthias .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2017, 181 :82-99
[7]  
Faeth GM, 1996, TWENTY-SIXTH SYMPOSIUM (INTERNATIONAL) ON COMBUSTION, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1593
[8]   BLOWOUT OF NONPREMIXED FLAMES - MAXIMUM COAXIAL AIR VELOCITIES ACHIEVABLE, WITH AND WITHOUT SWIRL [J].
FEIKEMA, D ;
CHEN, RH ;
DRISCOLL, JF .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1991, 86 (04) :347-358
[9]   ENHANCEMENT OF FLAME BLOWOUT LIMITS BY THE USE OF SWIRL [J].
FEIKEMA, D ;
CHEN, RH ;
DRISCOLL, JF .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1990, 80 (02) :183-195
[10]  
FRICKER N, 1976, J I FUEL, V49, P152