The impact of digital technology on enterprise green innovation: quality or quantity?

被引:4
作者
Fu, Xinyu [1 ]
Xu, Yanting [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Econ & Stat, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
来源
GREEN FINANCE | 2024年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
digital technology; green innovation; text mining; financing constraints; information constraints; TRANSFORMATION; SUBSIDY; PROFITABILITY; COST; RISK;
D O I
10.3934/GF.2024019
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Digital technology promotes the dual transformation of enterprise digitization and greenization, thereby promoting the synergistic efficiency between the digital economy and the green economy. This paper collected financial data from 2010 to 2021 from Chinese listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges. Through an in-depth semantic analysis of textual data, the study constructed an index to measure the level of enterprise digitization. Utilizing panel data models, the paper explored the impact of digital technology on enterprise green innovation and its mechanisms from the perspectives of quality and quantity. The research findings are as follows: (1) Digital technology significantly enhances the capability of enterprises for green innovation, with an emphasis on quality rather than quantity; (2) digital technology effectively alleviates financing constraints and information constraints, thereby enhancing the level of enterprise green innovation, but the former's effect is limited to small and medium-sized enterprises; (3) the "quality over quantity" effect of digital technology on enterprise green innovation is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises, non-heavy polluting industries, and enterprises located in regions with moderate to low levels of economic development.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 517
页数:34
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]   Developing green innovation performance by fostering of organizational knowledge and coopetitive relations [J].
Albort-Morant, Gema ;
Leal-Millan, Antonio ;
Cepeda-Carrion, Gabriel ;
Henseler, Jorg .
REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 12 (02) :499-517
[2]   Environmental, social and governance disclosure, integrated reporting, and the accuracy of analyst forecasts [J].
Bernardi, Cristiana ;
Stark, Andrew W. .
BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2018, 50 (01) :16-31
[3]  
Bhattacharya S, 2024, Operation ManagemenT, P44, DOI 10.4324/9781003404682-3
[4]   The interlink between digitalization, sustainability, and performance: An Italian context [J].
Broccardo, Laura ;
Truant, Elisa ;
Dana, Leo-Paul .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 158
[5]   How digitalization supports a sustainable business model: A literature review [J].
Broccardo, Laura ;
Zicari, Adrian ;
Jabeen, Fauzia ;
Bhatti, Zeeshan A. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 187
[6]   Does the import of green products encourage green technology innovation? Empirical evidence from China [J].
Chen, Ji ;
Wu, Liudan ;
Hao, Lili ;
Yu, Xiao ;
Streimikiene, Dalia .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2024, 200
[7]   Information quality and cost of credit bond financing [J].
Chen, Qian ;
Li, Yang ;
Zhao, Qiuyun ;
Liu, Fan .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 59
[8]   Does ownership concentration affect corporate environmental responsibility engagement? The mediating role of corporate leverage [J].
Chen, Shuanglian ;
Wang, Yan ;
Albitar, Khaldoon ;
Huang, Zhehao .
BORSA ISTANBUL REVIEW, 2021, 21 :S13-S24
[9]   Environmental Sustainability of Digitalization in Manufacturing: A Review [J].
Chen, Xiaoxia ;
Despeisse, Melanie ;
Johansson, Bjorn .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (24) :1-33
[10]   Can green credit policy promote low-carbon technology innovation? [J].
Chen, Zhigang ;
Zhang, Yuqi ;
Wang, Haisen ;
Ouyang, Xiao ;
Xie, Yuxi .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 359