Real exchange rate misalignment and economic growth: threshold effect of trade structure

被引:0
作者
Chen, Chao [1 ]
Zhang, Liyuan [2 ]
Ling, Jiyuan [3 ]
Kim, Yoonbai [4 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Normal Univ, Financial Engn, Major Quantitat Econ, Wuhu, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Business Coll, Major Quantitat Econ, Wuhu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Econ, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Gatton Business Sch, Lexington, KY USA
关键词
Real exchange rate misalignment; trade structure; threshold effect; economic growth; F43; O47; RATE VOLATILITY; FINANCIAL OPENNESS; DYNAMIC PANELS; UNDERVALUATION;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2024.2387866
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The growth effect of real exchange rate (RER) misalignment has been an unsolved issue for decades. Rodrik Hypothesis and opposing empirical evidence indicate potential non-linear nexus. This article introduces trade structure into the growth mechanism of RER misalignment and obtains robust empirical evidence employing threshold panel data method and a cross-economy panel dataset covering 67 economies and 40 years from 1980 to 2019. The findings suggest heterogenous growth effect of RER misalignment depending on trade structure: 1) for economies deeply depending on imported consumption goods, overvalued RER can enhance domestic economic development. 2) For economies focusing on exporting manufactures, RER undervaluation may boost domestic economic growth. And 3) for other economies, developed ones will benefit from overvaluation while developing ones benefit from undervaluation. The findings suggest that economies should take different exchange rate arrangements depending on their trade structure.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Alagidede P, 2017, J AFR BUS, V18, P169, DOI 10.1080/15228916.2017.1247330
[2]   Exchange rate undervaluation and economic growth: Diaz Alejandro (1965) revisited [J].
Alfredo Gluezmann, Pablo ;
Levy-Yeyati, Eduardo ;
Sturzenegger, Federico .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2012, 117 (03) :666-672
[3]  
Andrew B., 2010, The Real Exchange Rate and Growth Revisited: The Washington Consensus Strikes Back?
[4]   The effect of nominal exchange rate volatility on real macroeconomic performance in the CEE countries [J].
Arratibel, Olga ;
Furceri, Davide ;
Martin, Reiner ;
Zdzienicka, Aleksandra .
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 2011, 35 (02) :261-277
[5]   Real effective exchange rate volatility and growth: A framework to measure advantages of flexibility vs. costs of volatility [J].
Bagella, M ;
Beechetti, L ;
Hasan, I .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2006, 30 (04) :1149-1169
[6]   BUSINESS CYCLES AND THE EXCHANGE-RATE REGIME - SOME INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE [J].
BAXTER, M ;
STOCKMAN, AC .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1989, 23 (03) :377-400
[7]   GAINS FROM TRADE WITH VARIABLE TRADE ELASTICITIES [J].
Brooks, Wyatt J. ;
Pujolas, Pau S. .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 60 (04) :1619-1646
[8]   INVESTMENT IN MANUFACTURING, EXCHANGE-RATES AND EXTERNAL EXPOSURE [J].
CAMPA, J ;
GOLDBERG, LS .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 38 (3-4) :297-320
[9]  
Chen C., 2023, Digit Econ Sustain Dev, V1, P21, DOI [10.1007/s44265-023-00017-y, DOI 10.1007/S44265-023-00017-Y]
[10]  
Dal Bianco S, 2017, INT J FINANC STUD, V5, DOI 10.3390/ijfs5010006