The diversity of researchers' roles in sustainability science: the influence of project characteristics

被引:0
作者
Pajot, Guillaume [1 ]
Bergerot, Benjamin [2 ]
Dufour, Simon [3 ]
Viaud, Valerie [4 ]
Cudennec, Christophe [4 ]
Gruau, Gerard [5 ]
Bouadi, Tassadit [6 ]
Harpet, Cyrille [7 ]
de Dreuzy, Jean-Raynald [5 ]
Herve-Fournereau, Nathalie [8 ]
Van Tilbeurgh, Veronique [9 ]
Aquilina, Luc [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes, OSUR, UAR 3343, F-35000 Rennes, France
[2] Univ Rennes, Ecobio, F-35000 Rennes, France
[3] Univ Rennes 2, LETG, F-35000 Rennes, France
[4] INRAE, Inst Agro, UMR SAS, F-35000 Rennes, France
[5] Univ Rennes, CNRS, UMR Geosci, F-35000 Rennes, France
[6] Univ Rennes, IRISA, F-35000 Rennes, France
[7] Univ Rennes, CNRS, ARENES, UMR 6118, F-35000 Rennes, France
[8] Univ Rennes, UMR IODE, F-35000 Rennes, France
[9] Univ Rennes 2, UMR ESO, F-35000 Rennes, France
[10] Univ Rennes, UMR Geosci, F-35000 Rennes, France
关键词
Researchers' roles; Facilitation; Knowledge integration; Sustainability science; Transdisciplinary research; Interdisciplinary research; KNOWLEDGE; LESSONS; PROGRAM; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-024-01549-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite recent studies of researchers' roles in sustainability science, understanding the factors that influence them is a complex challenge. To address this lack of knowledge, we conducted a self-reflexive analysis involving 11 researchers from Rennes, France, who self-reflected on 12 projects conducted in north-western France over the past 15 years. This study investigates the roles of researchers in sustainability science projects by clustering these projects based on their characteristics and by evaluating the roles researchers assumed within each cluster. Four clusters were identified, ranging from academic research with minimal stakeholder involvement to highly interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary projects with significant stakeholder engagement. Researchers adopted multiple and dynamic roles, influenced by project characteristics but not deterministically. The role of transdisciplinary dialogue facilitator was frequently filled by intermediaries rather than researchers, highlighting a skills gap or a misalignment with traditional metrics of research performance. Self-reflection was significant in managing complex interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary projects, especially in clusters dealing with real-world problems and stakeholder interactions. The methodology, based on qualitative interviews and project clustering, proved effective and suggests that future research should include broader data collection and explore individual factors about mindset and motivation which influence researchers' roles. These findings emphasise the need for better support and recognition of diverse roles in academic evaluation and suggest the potential benefits of specialised intermediaries in transdisciplinary research.
引用
收藏
页码:1963 / 1977
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Role Theory Perspectives: Past, Present, and Future Applications of Role Theories in Management Research
    Anglin, Aaron H.
    Kincaid, Paula A.
    Short, Jeremy C.
    Allen, David G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2022, 48 (06) : 1469 - 1502
  • [2] Aquilina L., 2013, COURRIER ENV INRA, V2013, P63
  • [3] The challenging role of researchers coping with tensions, dilemmas and paradoxes in transdisciplinary settings
    Arnold, Marlen Gabriele
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 30 (02) : 326 - 342
  • [4] Expertise in research integration and implementation for tackling complex problems: when is it needed, where can it be found and how can it be strengthened?
    Bammer, Gabriele
    O'Rourke, Michael
    O'Connell, Deborah
    Neuhauser, Linda
    Midgley, Gerald
    Klein, Julie Thompson
    Grigg, Nicola J.
    Gadlin, Howard
    Elsum, Ian R.
    Bursztyn, Marcel
    Fulton, Elizabeth A.
    Pohl, Christian
    Smithson, Michael
    Vilsmaier, Ulli
    Bergmann, Matthias
    Jaeger, Jill
    Merkx, Femke
    Baptista, Bianca Vienni
    Burgman, Mark A.
    Walker, Daniel H.
    Young, John
    Bradbury, Hilary
    Crawford, Lynn
    Haryanto, Budi
    Pachanee, Cha-aim
    Polk, Merritt
    Richardson, George P.
    [J]. PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 6 (1)
  • [5] Evaluating an interdisciplinary research project: Lessons learned for organisations, researchers and funders
    Bark, Rosalind H.
    Kragt, Marit E.
    Robson, Barbara J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 34 (08) : 1449 - 1459
  • [6] Boundary spanning at the science-policy interface: the practitioners' perspectives
    Bednarek, A. T.
    Wyborn, C.
    Cvitanovic, C.
    Meyer, R.
    Colvin, R. M.
    Addison, P. F. E.
    Close, S. L.
    Curran, K.
    Farooque, M.
    Goldman, E.
    Hart, D.
    Mannix, H.
    McGreavy, B.
    Parris, A.
    Posner, S.
    Robinson, C.
    Ryan, M.
    Leith, P.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (04) : 1175 - 1183
  • [7] Beecher S.S., 2004, The handbook of global management: A guide to managing complexity, P121
  • [8] Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary context
    Belcher, Brian M.
    Rasmussen, Katherine E.
    Kemshaw, Matthew R.
    Zornes, Deborah A.
    [J]. RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2016, 25 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [9] RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN ROLE-THEORY
    BIDDLE, BJ
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1986, 12 : 67 - 92
  • [10] Writing on academic careers
    Blaxter, L
    Hughes, C
    Tight, M
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1998, 23 (03) : 281 - 295