Exploring institutional dynamics in a multi-level analysis in Southeast Europe

被引:1
作者
Lehmann, Tine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci HTW, Fac Business & Law, Treskowallee 8, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Institutional complexity; institutional voids; institutional asymmetries; Southeast Europe; transition economies; institutional logics; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; EASTERN-EUROPE; COMPLEXITY; BOSNIA; HERZEGOVINA; LOGICS; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; TRANSITION; RESPONSES; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1080/14631377.2024.2378622
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The European Union (EU) integration process of transition economies from Southeast Europe has faced significant political and economic challenges. Two decades in, these challenges persist, leading to slower-than-expected economic development and fostering local frustration, nationalism, populism, and migration flows. This article aims to disentangle the institutional complexities in these regions. Using an exploratory, inductive approach based on 30 qualitative interviews across three Southeast European countries, the research conducts a multi-level analysis. The findings reveal that complex institutional settings are characterised by institutional voids and asymmetries stemming from the transition process and EU integration. The perception of the overall institutional setup is central, negatively influenced by institutional voids and asymmetries but positively impacted by participatory law-making approaches. Additionally, competing institutional logics on the micro-level influence companies' perspective. This article provides insights into the institutional challenges faced by companies in transition economies, crucial for policy formulation and development projects in the context of EU integration. The key takeaway emphasises the importance of well-designed participatory policymaking, highlighting the need for careful preparation and a foundation of trust.
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 880
页数:29
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   Comparative Institutional Analysis and Institutional Complexity [J].
Ahmadjian, Christina L. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2016, 53 (01) :12-27
[2]   Does violence against civilians depress voter turnout? Evidence from Bosnia and Herzegovina [J].
Alacevich, Caterina ;
Zejcirovic, Dijana .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2020, 48 (04) :841-865
[3]  
Anderson R.C., 2016, Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, V12, P44
[4]   The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study [J].
Armstrong, D ;
Gosling, A ;
Weinman, J ;
Marteau, T .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 31 (03) :597-606
[6]   Uhljeb - a post-socialist homo croaticus: a personification of the economy of favours in Croatia? [J].
Banovic, Ruzica Simic .
POST-COMMUNIST ECONOMIES, 2019, 31 (03) :279-300
[7]   Elite and Everyday Social Contracts in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Pathways to Forging a National Social Contract? [J].
Belloni, Roberto ;
Ramovic, Jasmin .
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTION AND STATEBUILDING, 2020, 14 (01) :42-63
[8]   Corruption in post-conflict Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo: a deal among friends [J].
Belloni, Roberto ;
Strazzari, Francesco .
THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2014, 35 (05) :855-871
[9]   Smart specialization and institutional context: the role of institutional discovery, change and leapfrogging [J].
Benner, Maximilian .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2019, 27 (09) :1791-1810
[10]   Organizational responses to institutional complexity stemming from emerging logics: The role of individuals [J].
Bertels, Stephanie ;
Lawrence, Thomas B. .
STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2016, 14 (04) :336-372