Proportionality, Determinate Intervention Effects, and High-Level Causation

被引:1
作者
Fang, Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Jiji [2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Philosophy, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Philosophy, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
MENTAL CAUSATION; EXCLUSION; LIMITS;
D O I
10.1007/s10670-024-00859-8
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Stephen Yablo's notion of proportionality, despite controversies surrounding it, has played a significant role in philosophical discussions of mental causation and of high-level causation more generally. In particular, it is invoked in James Woodward's interventionist account of high-level causation and explanation, and is implicit in a novel approach to constructing variables for causal modeling in the machine learning literature, known as causal feature learning (CFL). In this article, we articulate an account of proportionality inspired by both Yablo's account of proportionality and the CFL account of variable construction. The resulting account has at least three merits. First, it illuminates an important feature of the notion of proportionality, when it is adapted to a probabilistic and interventionist framework. The feature is that at the center of the notion of proportionality lies the concept of "determinate intervention effects." Second, it makes manifest a virtue of (common types of) high-level causal/explanatory statements over low-level ones, when relevant intervention effects are determinate. Third, it overcomes a limitation of the CFL framework and thereby also addresses a challenge to interventionist accounts of high-level causation.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Explanatory Abstraction and the Goldilocks Problem: Interventionism Gets Things Just Right [J].
Blanchard, Thomas .
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2020, 71 (02) :633-663
[2]   Proportionality, causation, and exclusion [J].
Bontly, TD .
PHILOSOPHIA, 2005, 32 (1-4) :331-348
[3]   Interventionist counterfactuals [J].
Briggs, Rachael .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2012, 160 (01) :139-166
[4]  
Chalupka K., 2017, Behaviormetrika, V44, P137, DOI [10.1007/s41237-016-0008-2, DOI 10.1007/S41237-016-0008-2]
[5]  
Chalupka K, 2016, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1605.09370
[6]  
Chalupka K, 2015, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1412.2309
[7]  
Chalupka K, 2016, JMLR WORKSH CONF PRO, V51, P361
[8]   Proportionality and omissions [J].
Dowe, Phil .
ANALYSIS, 2010, 70 (03) :446-451
[9]   High-Level Explanation and the Interventionist's 'Variables Problem' [J].
Franklin-Hall, L. R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2016, 67 (02) :553-577
[10]   Measuring Causal Specificity [J].
Griffiths, Paul E. ;
Pocheville, Arnaud ;
Calcott, Brett ;
Stotz, Karola ;
Kim, Hyunju ;
Knight, Rob .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2015, 82 (04) :529-555