A Trust Model for Informed Agent Collaboration in Complex Tasks

被引:2
作者
Barbosa, Ricardo [1 ,2 ]
Santos, Ricardo [1 ]
Novais, Paulo [2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Porto, Escola Super Tecnol & Gestao, CIICESI, Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Minho, ALGORITMI Ctr, Braga, Portugal
来源
INTELLIGENT COMPUTING, VOL 3, 2024 | 2024年 / 1018卷
关键词
Trust; Collaboration; Complex tasks; Multi-Agent coalition systems; MULTIAGENT COALITION-FORMATION; NEGOTIATION;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-62269-4_5
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The execution of a complex task, by definition, presumes that it cannot be performed by a single entity and requires collaboration and cooperation between two, or more, entities. Such collaboration necessities include the correct identification of trustworthy entities to engage with, and the possibility of maintaining a collaboration scenario (even with a market competitor) without given up sensible information that would prevent an organisation to sustain its competitiveness. And even after selecting the right partners, agents need to trust that the negotiation outcomes will be enforced. In this work we propose a model that enables the collaboration between entities to solve a complex task, while negotiating their preferences, with trust mechanisms associated with the reputation of each agent, and the enforcement of the negotiation outcomes. To achieve this goal, our model relies on the definition of a competitive multi-agent coalition network, and a reputation layer that allows them to perform informed decisions when engaging with other agents. This model is supported by an immutable and distributed structure, that uses blockchain as a layer for knowledge representation, and smart contracts as enforcers of a negotiation process.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 76
页数:16
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Abeyratne S.A., 2016, INT J RES ENG TECHNO, V5, P1, DOI [10.15623/ijret.2016.0509001, DOI 10.15623/IJRET.2016.0509001]
[2]   Organizational and managerial challenges in the path toward Industry 4.0 [J].
Agostini, Lara ;
Filippini, Roberto .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 22 (03) :406-421
[3]   A multi-agent coalition formation method based on preference models [J].
Aknine, S ;
Pinson, S ;
Shakun, MF .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2004, 13 (06) :513-538
[4]  
Allen J, 2020, AI MAG, V41, P54
[5]   Multi-agent Negotiation of Decentralized Energy Production in Smart Micro-grid [J].
Amato, Alba ;
Di Martino, Beniamino ;
Scialdone, Marco ;
Venticinque, Salvatore .
INTELLIGENT DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING VIII, 2015, 570 :155-160
[6]   Blockchain Technologies: The Foreseeable Impact on Society and Industry [J].
Aste, Tomaso ;
Tasca, Paolo ;
Di Matteo, Tiziana .
COMPUTER, 2017, 50 (09) :18-28
[7]   Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiation: a comprehensive survey of opponent modeling techniques [J].
Baarslag, Tim ;
Hendrikx, Mark J. C. ;
Hindriks, Koen V. ;
Jonker, Catholijn M. .
AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2016, 30 (05) :849-898
[8]  
Barbosa R., 2023, ser. Communications in Computer and Information Science, V1838, P133
[9]   Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things [J].
Christidis, Konstantinos ;
Devetsikiotis, Michael .
IEEE ACCESS, 2016, 4 :2292-2303
[10]   Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decisionmaking effectiveness [J].
Dean, JW ;
Sharfman, MP .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (02) :368-396