Speech recognition and speech audiometry parameters in evaluation of aural rehabilitation progress in cochlear implant patients. Review paper

被引:1
作者
Rycko, Przemyslaw [1 ]
Rogowski, Marek [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Bialystok, M Sklodowskiej Curie St 24a, PL-15276 Bialystok, Poland
来源
POLISH JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY | 2024年 / 78卷 / 04期
关键词
aural rehabilitation; cochlear implant; prognostic factors; speech audiometry; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5604/01.3001.0054.5438
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Introduction: Speech audiometry is well established and frequently used test in audiology as well as in cochlear implant recipient's performance evaluation. Expanding indications for cochlear implantation forces use of more refined methods of both assessment and prognosis of outcome of aural rehabilitation. Variability of speech intelligibility tests and materials require standardized protocol facilitating outcome comparison. Aim: Aim of this review paper is analysis of usage of speech audiometry and other speech intelligibility tests and its results reporting in patients with cochlear implant in Poland and in the World. Materials and methods: Protocols of many different domestic and foreign health centers where compared, showing many methodological differences. Selection of literature for analysis was made according to PRISMA algorithm recommendations. Twenty research papers were chosen for review process. Discussion: In many papers we found lack of data regarding methodology of performed tests. Many authors indicate difficulties in comparing results, especially if publication lacks basic technical information. Despite that if right method is applied, results can be compared. In literature only one level of material presentation in test is prevalent. Speech audiometry is significant in exploring connections between multiple pre-op and post-op prognostic aspects of cochlear implantation. Conclusions: Because of variability in presentation and reporting of CI patients outcomes, consensus is needed in area of system facilitating comparison of research results. This may provide simple solution for accurate analysis and choosing right set of data. Schematic of presentation of audiological data in authors health center was proposed as example.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 10
页数:1
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Amernik K., 2020, Pol Otorhino Rev., V9, P1, DOI [10.5604/01.3001.0014.1374, DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0014.1374]
[2]   Factors Affecting Auditory Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: An Update with 2251 Patients [J].
Blamey, Peter ;
Artieres, Franoise ;
Baskent, Deniz ;
Bergeron, Francois ;
Beynon, Andy ;
Burke, Elaine ;
Dillier, Norbert ;
Dowell, Richard ;
Fraysse, Bernard ;
Gallego, Stephane ;
Govaerts, Paul J. ;
Green, Kevin ;
Huber, Alexander M. ;
Kleine-Punte, Andrea ;
Maat, Bert ;
Marx, Mathieu ;
Mawman, Deborah ;
Mosnier, Isabelle ;
O'Connor, Alec Fitzgerald ;
O'Leary, Stephen ;
Rousset, Alexandra ;
Schauwers, Karen ;
Skarzynski, Henryk ;
Skarzynski, Piotr H. ;
Sterkers, Olivier ;
Terranti, Assia ;
Truy, Eric ;
Van de Heyning, Paul ;
Venail, Frederic ;
Vincent, Christophe ;
Lazard, Diane S. .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2013, 18 (01) :36-47
[3]   A Retrospective Multicenter Study Comparing Speech Perception Outcomes for Bilateral Implantation and Bimodal Rehabilitation [J].
Blamey, Peter J. ;
Maat, Bert ;
Baskent, Deniz ;
Mawman, Deborah ;
Burke, Elaine ;
Dillier, Norbert ;
Beynon, Andy ;
Kleine-Punte, Andrea ;
Govaerts, Paul J. ;
Skarzynski, Piotr H. ;
Huber, Alexander M. ;
Sterkers-Artieres, Francoise ;
Van de Heyning, Paul ;
O'Leary, Stephen ;
Fraysse, Bernard ;
Green, Kevin ;
Sterkers, Olivier ;
Venail, Frederic ;
Skarzynski, Henryk ;
Vincent, Christophe ;
Truy, Eric ;
Dowell, Richard ;
Bergeron, Francois ;
Lazard, Diane S. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2015, 36 (04) :408-416
[4]   Long-TermInfluence of Electrode Array Length on Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users [J].
Canfarotta, Michael W. ;
Dillon, Margaret T. ;
Buchman, Craig A. ;
Buss, Emily ;
O'Connell, Brendan P. ;
Rooth, Meredith A. ;
King, English R. ;
Pillsbury, Harold C. ;
Adunka, Oliver F. ;
Brown, Kevin D. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2021, 131 (04) :892-897
[5]   Frequency reallocation based on cochlear place frequencies in cochlear implants: a pilot study [J].
Di Maro, Flavia ;
Carner, Marco ;
Sacchetto, Andrea ;
Soloperto, Davide ;
Marchioni, Daniele .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 279 (10) :4719-4725
[6]   A New Standardized Format for Reporting Hearing Outcome in Clinical Trials [J].
Gurgel, Richard K. ;
Jackler, Robert K. ;
Dobie, Robert A. ;
Popelka, Gerald R. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2012, 147 (05) :803-807
[7]   PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis [J].
Haddaway, Neal R. ;
Page, Matthew J. ;
Pritchard, Chris C. ;
McGuinness, Luke A. .
CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 18 (02)
[8]   Speech comprehension across multiple CI processor generations: Scene dependent signal processing [J].
Hey, Matthias ;
Boehnke, Britta ;
Mewes, Alexander ;
Munder, Patrick ;
Mauger, Stefan J. ;
Hocke, Thomas .
LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 6 (04) :807-815
[9]   Factors Affecting Open-Set Word Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants [J].
Holden, Laura K. ;
Finley, Charles C. ;
Firszt, Jill B. ;
Holden, Timothy A. ;
Brenner, Christine ;
Potts, Lisa G. ;
Gotter, Brenda D. ;
Vanderhoof, Sallie S. ;
Mispagel, Karen ;
Heydebrand, Gitry ;
Skinner, Margaret W. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2013, 34 (03) :342-360
[10]   Maximum preimplantation monosyllabic score as predictor of cochlear implant outcome [J].
Hoppe, Ulrich ;
Hocke, Thomas ;
Hast, Anne ;
Iro, Heinrich .
HNO, 2019, 67 (Suppl 2) :62-68